首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering: Theory, Methods and Applications >Construction of Credit Evaluation Index System for Two-Stage Bayesian Discrimination: An Empirical Analysis of Small Chinese Enterprises
【24h】

Construction of Credit Evaluation Index System for Two-Stage Bayesian Discrimination: An Empirical Analysis of Small Chinese Enterprises

机译:两阶段贝叶斯歧视信用评价指标体系的构建 - 中国小型企业的实证分析

获取原文
       

摘要

In China, small enterprises have a direct role in economic growth, but they have difficulty in financing development. To address this problem, this paper creates a small business credit evaluation index using a two-stage Bayesian discriminant model. In the first stage, customers are distinguished by whether they are in default, and in the second stage, customers with continuing default are divided into those with a high default loss rate and those with a low default loss rate. The literature to date has identified a credit index only for the first stage; the credit evaluation index proposed here is based on two stages, which is more sensitive. Then, we conduct an empirical analysis using credit data on 3,111 small enterprises in China with a two-stage nonparametric Bayesian discriminant model and a parametric discriminant model, and then, we test the two indicator systems with discriminant accuracy and an ROC curve; the discriminant accuracy of the established index system is 77.95% and 70.95%, respectively, and their prediction accuracy is 0.902 and 0.866, respectively; they show that the constructed indicator system is robust and effective. Finally, we conduct a comparative analysis of discriminant accuracy in three models, finding that the two-stage nonparametric model is optimal, the two-stage logistic regression model is suboptimal, and the two-stage parametric model is poor.
机译:在中国,小企业在经济增长中具有直接的作用,但它们难以融资发展。为了解决这个问题,本文使用两阶段贝叶斯判别模型创建了一个小型商业信用评估指标。在第一阶段,客户的特征在于它们是否默认,在第二阶段,延续默认值的客户分为具有高默认损耗率的客户和默认损耗率低的人。迄今为止的文献已经确定了第一阶段的信用指数;这里提出的信用评估指数基于两个阶段,这更敏感。然后,我们在中国的3111个小企业中进行了经验分析,具有两级非参数贝叶斯判别模型和参数判别模型,然后,我们以判别准确度和ROC曲线测试两个指示器系统;既定指标体系的判别准确性分别为77.95%和70.95%,其预测精度分别为0.902和0.866;他们表明,构造的指示系统是强大而有效的。最后,我们在三种模式进行判别准确的比较分析,发现这两个阶段的非参数模型是最优的,两级逻辑回归模型是次优的,并且两个阶段参数模型较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号