...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ophthalmology >Accuracy of Diabetic Retinopathy Staging with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network Using Ultra-Wide-Field Fundus Ophthalmoscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
【24h】

Accuracy of Diabetic Retinopathy Staging with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network Using Ultra-Wide-Field Fundus Ophthalmoscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

机译:使用超宽场基底眼镜检查和光学相干断层造影患有深卷积神经网络的糖尿病视网膜病变术的准确性

获取原文

摘要

Purpose . The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of diabetic retinopathy (DR) staging with a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) using two different types of fundus cameras and composite images. Method . The study included 491 ultra-wide-field fundus ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images that passed an image-quality review and were graded as no apparent DR (NDR; 169 images), mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR; 76 images), moderate NPDR (54 images), severe NPDR (90 images), and proliferative DR (PDR; 102 images) by three retinal experts by the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale. The findings of tests 1 and 2 to identify no apparent diabetic retinopathy (NDR) and PDR, respectively, were then assessed. For each verification, Optos, OCTA, and Optos OCTA imaging scans with DCNN were performed. Result . The Optos, OCTA, and Optos OCTA imaging test results for comparison between NDR and DR showed mean areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, 0.883, and 0.847; sensitivity rates of 80.9%, 83.9%, and 78.6%; and specificity rates of 55%, 71.6%, and 69.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, the Optos, OCTA, and Optos OCTA imaging test results for comparison between NDR and PDR showed mean AUC of 0.981, 0.928, and 0.964; sensitivity rates of 90.2%, 74.5%, and 80.4%; and specificity rates of 97%, 97%, and 96.4%, respectively. Conclusion . The combination of Optos and OCTA imaging with DCNN could detect DR at desirable levels of accuracy and may be useful in clinical practice and retinal screening. Although the combination of multiple imaging techniques might overcome their individual weaknesses and provide comprehensive imaging, artificial intelligence in classifying multimodal images has not always produced accurate results.
机译:目的 。本研究旨在使用两种不同类型的眼底照相机和复合图像比较糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)分段的糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的准确性。方法 。该研究包括491个超宽场基底眼镜检查和光学相干断层造影血管造影(OctA)图像,通过图像质量评审,并被评级为没有明显的DR(NDR; 169图像),温和的非促使DR(NPDR; 76图像)通过国际临床糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度规模,适度的NPDR(54图像),严重的NPDR(90张图像),以及三个视网膜专家的增殖博士(PDR; 102张图像)。然后分别评估测试1和2以鉴定无表观糖尿病视网膜病变(NDR)和PDR的发现。对于每个验证,OctA,OctA和Octos DCNN的Octa成像扫描。结果 。 NDR和DR之间的光学器,OctA和Opto octa成像测试结果显示在0.79,0.883和0.847的曲线(AUC)下的平均区域;敏感性率为80.9%,83.9%和78.6%;特异性分别为55%,71.6%和69.8%。同时,NDR和PDR之间的光学octa和Opta octa成像测试结果显示为0.981,0.928和0.964的平均AUC;敏感性率为90.2%,74.5%和80.4%;特异性分别为97%,97%和96.4%。结论 。与DCNN的光学和Octa成像的组合可以检测理想的准确性水平的博士,并且可用于临床实践和视网膜筛选。尽管多种成像技术的组合可能会克服他们的个人缺点并提供综合成像,但分类多峰图像的人工智能并不总是产生准确的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号