首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Comparison of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography with ultra-widefield colour fundus photography and fluorescein angiography for detection of lesions in diabetic retinopathy
【24h】

Comparison of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography with ultra-widefield colour fundus photography and fluorescein angiography for detection of lesions in diabetic retinopathy

机译:超域扫描源光学相干断层造影血管造影与超宽野外眼底摄影和荧光血管造影检测糖尿病视网膜病变检测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To compare widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (WF SS-OCTA) with ultra-widefield colour fundus photography (UWF CFP) and fluorescein angiography (UWF FA) for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions.This prospective, observational study was conducted at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from December 2018 to October 2019. Proliferative DR, non-proliferative DR and diabetic patients with no DR were included. All patients were imaged with a WF SS-OCTA using a Montage 15×15 mm scan. UWF CFP and UWF FA were taken by a 200°, single capture retinal imaging system. Images were independently evaluated for the presence or absence of DR lesions including microaneurysms (MAs), intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs), neovascularisation elsewhere (NVE), neovascularisation of the optic disc (NVD) and non-perfusion areas (NPAs). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V.25.0.One hundred and fifty-two eyes of 101 participants were included in the study. When compared with UWF CFP, WF SS-OCTA was found to be superior in detecting IRMAs (p0.001) and NVE/NVD (p=0.007). The detection rates of MAs, IRMAs, NVE/NVD and NPAs in WF SS-OCTA were comparable with UWF FA images (p0.05). Furthermore, when we compared WF SS-OCTA plus UWF CFP with UWF FA, the detection rates of MAs, IRMAs, NVE/NVD and NPAs were identical (p0.005). Agreement (κ=0.916) between OCTA and FA in classifying DR was excellent.WF SS-OCTA is useful for identification of DR lesions. WF SS-OCTA plus UWF CFP may offer a less invasive alternative to FA for DR diagnosis.
机译:与超宽野外彩色眼底摄影(UWF CFP)和荧光素血管造影(UWF FA)进行比较广场扫描源光学相干断层造影血管造影血管造影(WF SS-Octa),用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)病变。进行预期,进行了观察研究2018年12月至2019年12月至2019年10月,在马萨诸塞州的眼睛和耳朵。没有DR DR的增殖博士,非增殖性博士和糖尿病患者。所有患者均使用蒙太奇15×15mm扫描用WF SS-Octa成像。 UWF CFP和UWF FA采用200°,单捕获视网膜成像系统。可独立地评估图像的存在或不存在,包括MicroNeureySMS(MAS),intraretinal微血管异常(Irmas),别处(NVE),视神经圆盘(NVD)和非灌注区域(NPA)的新血管和非灌注区域(NPA)。使用SPSS V.25.0进行所有统计分析。该研究中包含一百五十二人的101名参与者的眼睛。与UWF CFP相比,发现WF SS-Octa检测Irmas(P <0.001)和NVE / NVD(P = 0.007)。在WF SS-Octa中的MAS,IRMA,NVE / NVD和NPA的检测速率与UWF FA图像(P&GT; 0.05)相当。此外,当我们使用UWF FA比较WF SS-Octa加UWF CFP时,MAS,IRMAS,NVE / NVD和NPA的检测速率相同(P&GT; 0.005)。 octa和FA之间的协议(κ= 0.916)在分类DR中,SS-Octa是可用于识别Dr病变的WF SS-Octa。 WF SS-Octa加UWF CFP可以为FA提供较少的侵入性替代品,以便诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号