...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ophthalmology >Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Patterns in Pseudophakic Diabetic Macular Oedema Eyes Treated with Anti-VEGF
【24h】

Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Patterns in Pseudophakic Diabetic Macular Oedema Eyes Treated with Anti-VEGF

机译:抗VEGF治疗伪糖尿病黄斑眼光治疗模式的回顾性分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background/Objectives . Currently, in England, antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is the first-line treatment for diabetic macular oedema (DMO) where central macular thickness (CMT) is ≥400 microns. In pseudophakic eyes with suboptimal response to first-line therapy, intravitreal corticosteroids may also be used. In practice, despite rigorous anti-VEGF therapy, suboptimal response occurs in nearly half of all eyes with DMO. The objective of this study was to investigate structural and functional outcomes and examine anti-VEGF treatment delivery in pseudophakic eyes receiving anti-VEGF injections for DMO. Methods . We performed a retrospective review of outcomes in 81 pseudophakic eyes with DMO that received at least 6 anti-VEGF injections. We reviewed baseline and posttreatment optical coherence tomography images, visual acuity, prescribing patterns, time taken to deliver anti-VEGF injections, and structural and functional outcomes. Results . It took an average of 913?±?454.1 days to deliver a mean of 11.1?±?4.7 anti-VEGF injections. Time from baseline to receiving the first 6 anti-VEGF injections was longer than 9 months in 74.7% ( n ?=?59/79) of eyes. There was a mean gain of 1.6 letters (?0.03 logMAR) from baseline to the end point. After 5 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections, the mean CMT was 391.9? μ m from 474.4? μ m at baseline ( ). In 52 of 79 eyes (65.8%), more than one type of anti-VEGF agent was used. Conclusions . The anti-VEGF treatment used to treat these eyes with DMO was suboptimal, a finding consistent with recently published “real-world” data. There was a strong tendency for patients to be switched within the class to a second anti-VEGF agent.
机译:背景/目标。目前,在英格兰,抗病毒内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)是糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)的一线治疗,其中中央黄斑厚度(CMT)≥400微米。在对次优应对第一线疗法的次优响应的假眼中,也可以使用玻璃体内皮质类固醇。在实践中,尽管严谨的抗VEGF治疗,但次优应对次次反应发生在近一半与DMO。本研究的目的是探讨结构和功能结果,并在接受DMO的抗VEGF注射的假眼药中检查抗VEGF治疗递送。方法 。我们对81个伪眼睛的结果进行了回顾性审查,DMO至少接受了至少6个抗VEGF注射。我们审查了基线和后处理光学相干断层扫描图像,视力,处方模式,以提供抗VEGF注射的时间,以及结构和功能结果。结果 。它平均花了913?±454.1天,以递送11.1?±4.7抗VEGF注射。从基线到接受前6个抗VEGF注射的时间超过了74.7%(N?= 59/79)的9个月。从基线到终点的基准有1.6个字母(?0.03 logmar)的平均增益。 5次抗VEGF玻璃体内注射后,平均CMT为391.9? μm距474.4?基线()μm。在79只眼睛的52中(65.8%),使用了多种类型的抗VEGF剂。结论。用DMO治疗这些眼睛的抗VEGF治疗是次优的,这是一个与最近发表的“现实世界”数据一致的发现一致。患者在课堂内切换到第二次抗VEGF代理人的趋势很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号