首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematics >Fire Safety Evaluation for Scenic Spots: An Evidential Best-Worst Method
【24h】

Fire Safety Evaluation for Scenic Spots: An Evidential Best-Worst Method

机译:风景斑点的消防安全评估:证据最佳的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Fire safety plays a vital role in tourism management, which can cause significant loss of life and property. It is necessary to present an efficient fire safety evaluation for scenic spots. However, some key issues are not well addressed in existing methods. For example, how to model experts’ opinions and how to combine them are still open problems. To address these issues, a new evaluation method based on the Dempster–Shafer evidence theory and best-worst method is presented. First, a fire safety evaluation index system is constructed using the domino model. Domain experts can evaluate different factors with linguistic assessments. The best-worst method is used to determine the weights of different factors. Then, these weighted linguistic assessments are efficiently fused by Dempster’s combination rule to obtain the evaluation result. Finally, a case study is illustrated to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method in fire safety evaluation for scenic spots. The main contribution of the proposed method is to represent and handle the uncertainty in experts’ linguistic assessments, so as to decrease the uncertainty and improve decision making. In addition, the weight determination method BWM is easier and more reliable than the existing method AHP.
机译:消防安全在旅游管理中发挥着至关重要的作用,这可能导致损失的生命和财产。有必要对景区提供有效的消防安全评估。但是,某些关键问题在现有方法中不好解决。例如,如何建模专家的意见以及如何结合它们仍然是打开问题。为了解决这些问题,提出了一种基于Dempster-Shafer证据理论和最佳最糟糕的方法的新评估方法。首先,使用Domino模型构建防火安全评估指标系统。域专家可以评估具有语言评估的不同因素。最糟糕的方法用于确定不同因素的权重。然后,这些加权语言评估通过Dempster的组合规则有效地融合,以获得评估结果。最后,示出了案例研究以证明所提出的方法在景点的消防安全评估中的效率。拟议方法的主要贡献是在专家语言评估中代表和处理不确定性,从而减少不确定性和改善决策。另外,重量确定方法BWM比现有方法AHP更容易且更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号