首页> 外文期刊>European Researcher. Series A >How to Return the Sociology and Economics to the Family of Objective Sciences? Criticism of the Current State of Humanitarian Knowledge. Part I
【24h】

How to Return the Sociology and Economics to the Family of Objective Sciences? Criticism of the Current State of Humanitarian Knowledge. Part I

机译:如何将社会学和经济学返回到客观科学系列? 对现有人道主义知识状态的批判。 第I部分

获取原文
           

摘要

Socio-economic science has not revealed the objective structure of society: it has not recognized and does not study the objective unavoidable poverty, ignores the working class, and has not established the objective properties of the hierarchy of power.The objective boundaries between poverty and prosperity, between prosperity and luxury are undisclosed, which discredits the social policy of states.Social science imposes on society the subjective criteria of poverty, a fictitious category of the middle class, and false parameters of inequality, designed not to identify, but to mask huge social problems.Humanitarian science has not clarified the content of socioeconomic relations, including solving the problem of exploitation, which has brought incalculable sacrifices to the world.Socio-economic science has withdrawn itself from the development of ethics, effectively losing the right to be called humanitarian.Socio-economic knowledge limited itself to a special status and self-isolated itself from the family of objective sciences, did not find the basic empirical phenomena, and eventually turned out to be a fruitless non-empirical branch.Within the framework of humanitarian knowledge, there are no fundamental studies aimed at finding the relationships of nodal categories and general laws, including the topology of the socio-economic space, the ignorance of which is destructive for developed science.There are no theories of the most important categories including family, capital and capitalism in the humanities, there is no analytical formula where dimensional categories are linked in a stable manner.Socio-economic knowledge did not develop the theory of social evolution and was unable to understand the phenomena of historical degradation of the labor communities and demographic transition – the most tragic events in modern human history.
机译:社会经济科学并未揭示社会的客观结构:它尚未认识到并没有研究目标不可避免的贫困,忽略了工人阶级,并没有建立权力等级的客观性质。贫困之间的客观边界繁荣,繁荣与奢侈品之间的繁荣是未公开的,这诋毁了各国的社会政策。社会科学对社会的主观性标准,中产阶级的虚构类别,以及不平等的虚假参数,设计不识别,而是为了掩盖巨大的社会问题。乌马尼亚人科学并未澄清社会经济关系的内容,包括解决剥削问题,这为世界带来了无法估量的牺牲。社会经济科学已从道德的发展中取消,有效地失去了被称为人道主义者。社会经济知识限制了自己的特殊地位和自我孤立本身从客观科学家庭,没有找到基本的经验现象,并最终成为一个毫无终身的非实证分支。在人道主义知识的框架中,没有旨在找到节点类别的关系的基本研究一般法律,包括社会经济空间的拓扑,对发达的科学的无知是对发达的科学有所破坏性的。没有最重要的类别的理论,包括家庭,资本和资本主义在人文科学中,没有尺寸类别的分析公式以稳定的方式联系。社会经济知识并未发展社会演变理论,无法理解劳动社区和人口转型的历史退化现象 - 现代人类历史上最悲惨的事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号