...
首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia >Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in patient undergoing open nephrectomy: A randomized controlled study
【24h】

Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in patient undergoing open nephrectomy: A randomized controlled study

机译:超声引导射击筛孢子醛平面块与术后镇痛术后脑膜术后脑膜脑膜脑膜块:随机对照研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Objective: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide analgesia in open abdominal surgeries in case reports or case series. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESPB and anterior Quadratus Lumborum block (QLB III) as a postoperative analgesic for open nephrectomy. Methods: Seventy five patients scheduled for open nephrectomy were randomly allocated into three equal groups (25 each); group (C) patients operated under general anesthesia while in (QLB and ESPB) groups, patients received general anesthesia followed by unilateral (QLBIII or ESPB) respectively, with 0.3–0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%. The primary outcome was the 24 h cumulative morphine given postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the first rescue analgesic time, postoperative pain score, time to perform technique and sensory block coverage. Results: The 24 cumulative morphine consumption and first rescue analgesic time were significantly higher and shorter, respectively, in control group compared to the QLB and ESPB groups with no significant difference between interventional groups. VAS score at rest and during move- ment was significant higher in control group at all different timing measurements compared to the interventional groups. The block performing time was significant shorter in ESPB compared to QLB and the coverage of QLB extends from T8 to L2 and ESPB from T6 to T12. Conclusion: The ESPB is as efficient as QLB III to provide analgesia and decrease perioperative opioid consumption, taking into account the technically challenging and the time consuming of QLB III making ESPB a highly promising alternative for postoperative pain relief following open nephrectomy.
机译:背景和目的:据报道,射击筛斜面(ESPB)在报告或案例系列中提供开放的腹手术中的镇痛。我们旨在比较ESPB和前Quadratus Lumborum块(QLB III)作为开放肾切除术后镇痛的效果。方法:将七十五名患者随机分配成三个相等的群(每组25个);组(c)患者在全身麻醉下运营,而在(QLB和ESPB)组中,患者分别接受过全身麻醉,分别是单侧(QLBIII或ESPB),0.3-0.4ml / kg Bupivacaine 0.25%。主要结果是术后24小时累积吗啡。二次结果是第一次救援镇痛时间,术后疼痛得分,执行技术的时间和感官块覆盖。结果:与QLB和ESPB组相比,对照组的24例累积吗啡消费和第一救援镇痛时间分别明显较高,较短,介入群体之间没有显着差异。与介入群体相比,对照组的对照组中,静静脉和移动期间的VAS分数显着较高。与QLB相比,ESPB中的块执行时间很大,并且QLB的覆盖范围从T8到L2和ESPB从T6到T12延伸。结论:ESPB与QLB III有效,以提供镇痛和减少围手术期逐方消费,同时考虑到QLB III的QLB III使ESPB成为开放肾切除术后术后疼痛缓解的高度有希望的替代品的耗时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号