首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Dentistry >Efficacy of MI Paste? on Bleaching-Related Sensitivity: Randomized Clinical Trial
【24h】

Efficacy of MI Paste? on Bleaching-Related Sensitivity: Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:Mi糊的功效? 漂白相关灵敏度:随机临床试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background . To evaluate the effectiveness of MI Paste? in reducing sensitivity associated with vital tooth bleaching. Methods . This randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial included 45 subjects that were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1, the maxillary arch was the control arch (only bleaching), while the mandibular arch was the intervention arch (bleaching and MI Paste?). In Group 2, the mandibular arch was the control arch (only bleaching), while the maxillary arch was the intervention arch (bleaching and MI Paste?). Subjects started with the control arch and then switched to the intervention arch after two weeks. Subjects were instructed to use MI Paste? in a custom tray for 5 minutes, wait for 1 hour, and then bleach overnight using a different tray. Sensitivity was measured using both a thermal sensitivity test and a daily log of sensitivity for 14 days. Shade was evaluated using a colorimeter and a shade guide. Results . Immediately after treatment, the thermal test sensitivity scores for the arches bleached without MI Paste? were greater than those with MI Paste? ( ). Arches not receiving the MI Paste? treatment showed significantly higher VAS sensitivity scores during the 14-day period of bleaching ( ). The mean score for the 14-day period was 37.9 for the arches not treated with MI Paste? versus 27.5 for the treated arches. Both the intervention group and the control group showed significantly lighter shade relative to baseline ( ) with no significant difference between them ( ). Conclusion . MI Paste? significantly reduced the sensitivity associated with bleaching and did not interfere with shade change.
机译:背景 。评估MI糊的有效性吗?降低与生命牙齿漂白相关的敏感性。方法 。该随机控制的分裂口临床试验包括45项被随机分为两组的受试者。在第1组中,上颌拱是控制拱(仅漂白),而下颌拱是干预曲目(漂白和MI糊吗?)。在第2组中,下颌拱是对照拱(仅漂白),而上颌拱是干预曲拱(漂白和Mi糊状物?)。受试者从控制拱门开始,然后在两周后切换到干预拱门。指示受试者使用MI粘贴?在自定义托盘中5分钟,等待1小时,然后使用不同的托盘漂白过夜。使用热敏测试和每日敏感度的每日测量来测量灵敏度14天。使用色度计和阴影指南进行评估遮阳篷。结果 。治疗后立即,拱门的热试验敏感性分数没有Mi糊状物?比用mi糊的人大? ()。拱门没有收到mi粘贴?在漂白剂()的14天期间,治疗显示出显着更高的VAS敏感性分数。 14天的平均得分为37.9,对于未治疗MI糊治疗的拱门?与治疗拱门的27.5。干预组和对照组都显示出相对于基线()的显着较轻的阴影(),它们之间没有显着差异()。结论 。 mi酱?显着降低了与漂白相关的敏感性,并且不会干扰阴影变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号