首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Dentistry >In Vitro Effect of Acidic Solutions and Sodium Fluoride on Surface Roughness of Two Types of CAD-CAM Dental Ceramics
【24h】

In Vitro Effect of Acidic Solutions and Sodium Fluoride on Surface Roughness of Two Types of CAD-CAM Dental Ceramics

机译:酸性溶液和氟化钠对两种CAD-CAM牙科陶瓷表面粗糙度的体外影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives . This study assessed the effect of immersion in acidic solutions and sodium fluoride on surface roughness of dental ceramics. Materials and Methods . 40 blocks of Vitablocs Mark II and IPS e.max CAD (5?×?5?×?3) were prepared. The samples were divided into five groups ( n ?=?8) for immersion in artificial saliva (control), artificially prepared gastric acid, acetic acid, 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?gastric acid, and 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?acetic acid. The samples were immersed for 168 hours in the respective solutions except for sodium fluoride, in which the samples were immersed for 69 hours. The surface roughness of samples was measured before and after immersion using a profilometer. The surface roughness changes of three specimens of each group were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test, and independent t-test. Results . Significant changes were noted in Ra ( ) and Rq ( ) in both types of ceramics. The lowest changes in Ra and Rq parameters were seen in artificial saliva and gastric acid and highest changes occurred following immersion in 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?acetic acid and 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?gastric acid, respectively. Changes in Rz were also significant following immersion in Vitablocs Mark II ( ). Immersion in 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?gastric acid and 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?acetic acid produced a rougher surface on both types of ceramics (SEM). Conclusion . Exposure of Vitablocs Mark II CAD and IPS e.max CAD to 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?gastric acid and 0.02% sodium fluoride?+?acetic acid significantly increased their surface roughness, while for Vitablocs Mark II, lager defects were seen on its surface.
机译:目标。该研究评估了浸渍酸性溶液和氟化钠对牙科陶瓷表面粗糙度的影响。材料和方法 。制备40个Vitablocs Mark II和IPS E.Max CAD(5?×β5?×3)。将样品分为五组(n?=Δ8),用于浸入人工唾液(对照),人工制备的胃酸,乙酸,0.02%氟化钠α+α胃酸和0.02%氟化钠?+γ+?醋酸酸。除氟化钠外,将样品浸入相应的溶液中168小时,其中将样品浸渍69小时。使用型材仪之前和之后测量样品的表面粗糙度。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估每组三个标本的表面粗糙度变化。使用单向和双向Anova,Tukey的测试和独立的T检验进行分析数据。结果 。在两种类型的陶瓷中的RA()和RQ()中注意到了显着的变化。在人造唾液和胃酸中看到Ra和Rq参数的最低变化,并在浸入0.02%氟化钠α+α+α和0.02%氟化钠α+胃酸中发生最高变化。在Vitablocs Mark II()中浸泡后,RZ的变化也显着。浸入0.02%氟化钠α+αα和0.02%氟化钠α+α+?乙酸在两种类型的陶瓷(SEM)上产生了更粗糙的表面。结论 。将Vitablocs Mark II CAD和IPS E.max CAD暴露至0.02%氟化钠?胃酸和0.02%氟化钠?+γ致乙酸显着提高了它们的表面粗糙度,而对于Vitablocs Mark II,其表面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号