首页> 外文期刊>Complexity >Vibration Reliability Analysis of Drum Brake Using the Artificial Neural Network and Important Sampling Method
【24h】

Vibration Reliability Analysis of Drum Brake Using the Artificial Neural Network and Important Sampling Method

机译:使用人工神经网络和重要采样方法的鼓式制动的振动可靠性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

This research aims to evaluate the calculation accuracy and efficiency of the artificial neural network-based important sampling method (ANN-IS) on reliability of structures such as drum brakes. The finite element analysis (FEA) result is used to establish the ANN sample in ANN-based reliability analysis methods. Because the process of FEA is time-consuming, the ANN sample size has a very important influence on the calculation efficiency. Two types of ANNs used in this study are the radial basis function neural network (RBF) and back propagation neural network (BP). RBF-IS and BP-IS methods are used to conduct reliability analysis on training samples of three different sizes, and the results are compared with several reliability analysis methods based on ANNs. The results show that the probability of failure of the RBF-IS method is closer to that of the Monte-Carlo simulation method (MCS) than those of other methods (including BP-IS). In addition, the RBF-IS method has better calculation efficiency than the other methods considered in this study. This research demonstrates that the RBF-IS method is well suited to structure reliability problems.
机译:该研究旨在评估基于人工神经网络的重要采样方法(Ann-IS)的计算精度和效率,以诸如鼓式制动器的结构的可靠性。有限元分析(FEA)结果用于在基于安基的可靠性分析方法中建立ANN样品。因为FEA的过程是耗时的,所以ANN样品大小对计算效率具有非常重要的影响。本研究中使用的两种类型的ANN是径向基函数神经网络(RBF)和后传播神经网络(BP)。 RBF-IS和BP-IS方法用于对三种不同尺寸的训练样本进行可靠性分析,并将结果与​​基于ANNS的若干可靠性分析方法进行比较。结果表明,RBF-IS方法失败的概率比其他方法(包括BP-IS)更接近Monte-Carlo仿真方法(MCS)的概率。此外,RBF-IS方法具有比本研究中考虑的其他方法更好的计算效率。该研究表明,RBF是方法非常适合于结构可靠性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号