首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis

机译:在当代欧洲共同体国家,真的是十分之一的人认为,在当代欧洲共同体国家存在资本惩罚吗?认可,先进,预期的复制研究和Meta分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Till et al. (2016) reported that in an Austrian sample approximately one in ten respondents incorrectly believed that Austria still practices, or recently practiced, the death penalty, and that there is a positive association between the amount of weekly television viewing and this gross misperception of the Austrian justice system. Methods: An endorsed, prereviewed, preregistered close replication attempt (N = 597) served to test the veracity of these reported effects. This was coupled with an conceptual extension part, which (a) investigated the potential influence of watching American crime series, (b) accounted for further possible confounds, and (c) tested the generalizability of the effect of television viewing to online streaming. Results: Online survey data (N = 597) replicated the one-in-ten prevalence of incorrect answers with the 5-item death penalty questionnaire used in the original study, but not, when asking directly about Austria’s death penalty practices (prevalence: 0.3%). Younger age, but not the amount of television viewing or online streaming, suggestibility, or preferred TV genre turned consistently predicted incorrect answers in the death penalty questionnaire. Incorrect answers were Mokken-scalable (i.e., formed a common scale, complying with a nonparametric item response model) and were highly consistent. In contrast to the replication study results, a small meta-analysis of all available evidence (3 studies, including the present replication) suggested that the aggregate effect of television viewing nominally was significant, albeit small. Conclusion: The replication study yielded mixed results, which indicate a high prevalence of beliefs that there is capital punishment in a country without death penalty probably is due to a faultily designed questionnaire and thus a research artifact. Also, positive associations of television viewing with such beliefs likely are only small at best.
机译:背景:直到等。 (2016年)报告说,在奥地利样本中,在十个受访者中大约一个错误地认为,奥地利仍然认为,或最近练习,死刑,并且在每周电视观看金额与奥地利的误解之间存在积极的协会司法系统。方法:批准,先验,预期的紧密复制尝试(n = 597)用于测试这些报告的效果的真实性。这与概念延伸部分相结合,(a)调查了观看美国犯罪系列的潜在影响,(b)占进一步可能的混淆,(c)测试了电视观察对在线流媒体效果的普遍性。结果:在线调查数据(n = 597)复制了原始研究中使用的5项死刑问卷的不正确答案的十个次数,但在直接询问奥地利的死刑实践时(普遍存在:0.3 %)。年龄较小,但不是电视观看或在线流媒体的数量,表演,或者首选电视类型在死刑问卷中持续预测不正确的答案。答案不正确的答案是Mokken可扩展(即,形成了常规规模,符合非参数项目响应模型),并且非常一致。与复制研究结果相比,对所有可用证据的少数荟萃分析(3项研究,包括本复制)表明电视观看名义上的总效应是显着的,尽管小。结论:复制研究产生了混合的结果,表明存在的信仰普遍存在的普遍性,即没有死刑的国家有资本惩罚可能是由于一个缺陷的问卷,因此是一项研究伪影。此外,电视观看与这种信仰的积极协会很可能只是最小的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号