首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Code-Switching Does Not Equal Code-Switching. An Event-Related Potentials Study on Switching From L2 German to L1 Russian at Prepositions and Nouns
【24h】

Code-Switching Does Not Equal Code-Switching. An Event-Related Potentials Study on Switching From L2 German to L1 Russian at Prepositions and Nouns

机译:代码切换不等于代码切换。在介词和名词中从L2德语切换到L1俄语的事件相关的潜力研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies on event-related potentials (ERP) in code-switching (CS) have concentrated on single-word insertions, usually nouns. However, CS ranges from inserting single words into the main language of discourse to alternating languages for larger segments of a discourse, and can occur at various syntactic positions and with various word classes. This ERP study examined native speakers of Russian who had learned German as a second language; they were asked to listen to sentences with CS from their second language, German, to their first language, Russian. CS included either a whole prepositional phrase or only the lexical head noun of a prepositional phrase. CS at nouns resulted in a late positive complex (LPC), whereas CS at prepositions resulted in a broad early negativity, which was followed by an anterior negativity with a posterior positivity. Only in the last time window (800–1000 ms) did CS at prepositions result in a broad positivity similar to CS at nouns. The differences between both types of CS indicate that they relate to different psycholinguistic processes.
机译:关于Code-Switching(CS)中的事件相关潜力(ERP)的研究已经集中在单词插入上,通常是名词。然而,CS范围从单位插入谈话的主要语言,以进行更大的话语段的交替语言,并且可以在各种句法位置和各种单词类中发生。这个ERP研究检查了俄罗斯母语的母语,他们将德语学习为第二语言;他们被要求听取与他们的第二语言,德语,俄语的第一语言的句子。 CS包括整个介词短语或仅介词短语的词汇头名词。名词的CS导致晚期正综合复合体(LPC),而介质的Cs导致广泛的早期消极性,其次是与后阳性的前否定性。只有在最后一次窗口(800-1000 ms)中,介词的CS会导致与名词的CS相似的广泛阳性。两种类型的CS之间的差异表明它们与不同的精神语言过程有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号