首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Are All Remote Associates Tests Equal? An Overview of the Remote Associates Test in Different Languages
【24h】

Are All Remote Associates Tests Equal? An Overview of the Remote Associates Test in Different Languages

机译:所有远程员工都是相等的吗?以不同语言的远程关联测试概述

获取原文
           

摘要

The Remote Associates Test (RAT, CRA) is a classical creativity test used to measure creativity as a function of associative ability. The RAT has been administered in different languages. Nonetheless, because of how embedded in the language the test is, only a few items are directly translatable, and most of the time the RAT is created anew in each language. This process of manual (and in two cases computational) creation of RAT items is guided by the researchers’ understanding of the task. However, are the RAT items in different languages comparable? In this paper, different RAT stimuli datasets are analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Significant differences are observed between certain datasets in terms of solver performance. The potential sources of these differences are discussed, together with what this means for creativity psychometrics and computational vs. manual creation of stimuli.
机译:远程员工测试(RAT,CRA)是一种经典创造性测试,用于测量创造力作为关联能力的函数。大鼠以不同的语言给药。尽管如此,由于测试的语言是如何嵌入的,只有少数项目直接可翻译,大部分时间都在每种语言中重新创建大鼠。这一过程的手册(和在两个案例中计算)的大鼠项目的创建是由研究人员对任务的理解指导的。但是,大鼠是不同语言的大鼠项目是否可比?在本文中,定性和定量分析不同的大鼠刺激数据集。在求解器性能方面,某些数据集之间观察到显着差异。讨论了这些差异的潜在来源,以及创造性心理学性和计算与手动创造刺激的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号