The objectives in this study are as follows: (a) to analyze the responsibility of notary public in the creation of an affirmation deed of the amendment of an association. (b) To analyse the legal consequences for a notary public who carries out responsibility for the creation of the affirmation deed of the association's Articles on an unmeticulously and inscrutiny basis. This thesis uses normative research methods, by collecting and analyzing the legal materials in a descriptive order to get an overview or exposure of the problem in the study. The result of this study that the responsibility of the notary in the creation of the deed of either the deed of association, the deed of change or the deed of affirmation, the first is the responsibility in fulfilling the formyl element a deed which means an authentic deed functioning for its complete or perfect ( not for the validity of ) an act of law, then the act must be set in an authentic. Second, to fulfill the element as a tool of evidence in the day. While the legal consequences for the notary public who carry out duties and responsibilities are not carefully and do not cause a deed has no strength as an authentic deed because it does not fulfill the elements of formyl and proof function, then the notary in question can be held accountable both the civil, criminal and administratively.
展开▼
