首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >Juridical Analysis the Government's Dissolution of Cooperatives (Study in Mataram City)
【24h】

Juridical Analysis the Government's Dissolution of Cooperatives (Study in Mataram City)

机译:司法分析政府合作社的解散(在Mataram City的研究)

获取原文
           

摘要

The decree of the dissolution of the government is done if there is an evidence that the cooperative concerned does not meet the provisions of law number 25, 1992 about the urban and Government Regulation number 17, 1994 about the dissolution of cooperatives by the Government, which is the activities are contrary to public order and/or morality and survival can no longer be expected. The number of cooperatives carried out by the Government of Mataram City in 2017-2018 indicates that there is a weakness in the management of cooperatives so that it certainly inflict harm to members of the cooperatives concerned. The problem discussed in this research is the reason for the dissolution of cooperatives by the government in Mataram City and the form of legal protection against members of cooperatives that were dissolved by the government. This research is a research on empirical law with consideration to obtain a direct picture of the dissolution of cooperatives by the government in Mataram City. The approach used is a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a sociological approach. Data collection techniques by conducting studies in the field by interviews form, then carried out data processing and analyzed descriptively so that the answers for existing problems are obtained. Based on the results of the study can be concluded that the reason of the Government is dissolving against to some cooperatives in Mataram City because the cooperative does not convey annual report and does not hold the RAT ( Annual member meeting) for more than 2 ( two ) years in a row. There are 2 ( two ) forms of legal protection for members of cooperatives that are disbanded by the Government, namely preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection.
机译:如果有证据表明有关合作社没有达到1992年1994年的法律规定的规定,1994年1994年关于政府的解散,那么政府的解散法令这些活动是否与公共秩序和/或道德和生存不再预期。 2017 - 2018年Mataram City政府开展的合作社人数表明,合作社管理有弱点,以至于它对有关合作社成员肯定会造成伤害。本研究中讨论的问题是政府在Mataram City解散合作社的原因以及对政府解散的合作社成员的法律保护的形式。本研究是对实证法律的研究,以便在Mataram City的政府获得合作社解散的直接图表。使用的方法是法定方法,一种概念方法,社会学方法。通过面试形式进行现场研究的数据收集技术,然后进行数据处理并描述地分析,以便获得现有问题的答案。根据该研究的结果,可以得出结论,政府的原因正在抵御Mataram City的一些合作社,因为合作社没有传达年度报告,并没有持有大鼠(年度会议)超过2(二连续年份。政府解散的合作社成员有2(两种)形式的法律保护,即预防性法律保护和镇压法律保护。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号