...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >The Independence of the Business Competition Court from the Perspective of Law Enforcement System in Indonesia
【24h】

The Independence of the Business Competition Court from the Perspective of Law Enforcement System in Indonesia

机译:来自印度尼西亚执法制度的观点的商业竞争法庭的独立性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Fair competition law enforcement on business competition issues in Indonesia is very important to ensure the situation of conducive business competition and the enforcement in Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, therefore the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition of the Republic of Indonesia (KPPU) is actively involved in issuing related regulations with law enforcement procedures on business competition cases in Indonesia, which is through KPPU Regulation Number 1 of 2010 on Procedures for Case Handling. The judicial system of the business competition court in Indonesia can not be separated from the role of the KPPU as an institution that has the function of regulating and supervising competition behaviour, whether using prohibited activity patterns or agreements. In the context of law enforcement on business competition cases, KPPU has the authority from performing investigations to examining and deciding the competition cases in judicial institutions held by KPPU. Observing the main function of KPPU as a supervisory institution and situation regulator of the business competition in Indonesia, the authority of KPPU that perform investigations to judge business competition cases certainly is not an issue that needs to be debated. However, from the perspective of the justice system in Indonesia, KPPU’s authority in conducting investigations, examining, and deciding cases is a matter that needs to be studied more deeply, specifically regarding the guarantee of justice sense for business actors who are positioned as Reported Party.
机译:公平竞争执法印度尼西亚的商业竞争问题对于确保有利的商业竞争和1999年第5号法律规定禁止垄断实践和不公平的商业竞争的行为非常重要,因此是商业竞争监管委员会在印度尼西亚共和国(KPPU)积极参与与印度尼西亚的商务竞争案件的执法程序发出相关规定,这是通过2010年的KPPU法规第1号在案件处理程序上。印度尼西亚商业竞争法院的司法系统不能与嘉宝的作用分开,作为具有规范和监督竞争行为的机构的机构,无论是使用违禁活动模式或协议。在贸易竞争案件的执法范围内,毕区有权履行鉴定和决定毕区举行的司法机构竞争案件的调查。观察KPPU作为印度尼西亚商业竞争的监督机构和情况监管机构,鉴定商业竞争案件的核心议员的权威肯定不是需要辩论的问题。然而,从印度尼西亚的司法系统的角度来看,毕业议员在进行调查,审查和决定案件方面的权威是一个需要更深入地研究的问题,特别是关于作为报告缔约方定位的商业行为者的司法意识保障。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号