...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems >Comparative Study of CNN and LSTM for Opinion Mining in Long Text
【24h】

Comparative Study of CNN and LSTM for Opinion Mining in Long Text

机译:CNN和LSTM在长篇文章中挑战的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The digital revolution has encouraged many companies to set up new strategic and operational mechanisms to supervise the flow of information published about them on the Web. Press coverage analysis is a part of sentiment analysis that allows companies to discover the opinion of the media concerning their activities, products and services. It is an important research area, since it involves the opinion of informed public such as journalists, who may influence the opinion of their readers. However, from an implementation perspective, the analysis of the opinion from media coverage encounters many challenges. In fact, unlike social networks, the Media coverage is a set of large textual documents written in natural language. The training base being huge, it is necessary to adopt large-scale processing techniques like Deep Learning to analyze their content. To guide researchers to choose between one of the most commonly used models CNN and LSTM, we compare and apply both models for opinion mining from long text documents using real datasets.
机译:数字革命鼓励许多公司建立新的战略和运营机制,以监督关于网络上发表的信息流程。新闻覆盖分析是情感分析的一部分,使公司能够发现有关其活动,产品和服务的媒体的意见。这是一个重要的研究领域,因为它涉及告知公众的意见,例如记者,他们可能会影响读者的意见。然而,从实施角度来看,媒体覆盖范围的意见分析了许多挑战。实际上,与社交网络不同,媒体覆盖率是一组以自然语言编写的大型文本文档。培训基础是巨大的,有必要采用深度学习的大规模加工技巧来分析其内容。为了指导研究人员选择CNN和LSTM最常用的模型之一,我们使用真实数据集比较和应用两种型号的意见挖掘模型。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号