...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Nutrition >Impact of Arachidonic and Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Neural and Immune Development in the Young Pig
【24h】

Impact of Arachidonic and Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Neural and Immune Development in the Young Pig

机译:花生素和十二碳甲酸的影响对年轻猪神经和免疫发育的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Human milk contains both arachidonic acid (ARA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Supplementation of infant formula with ARA and DHA results in fatty acid (FA) profiles, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and immune responses in formula-fed infants that are more like those observed in breastfed infants. Consequently, ARA and DHA have been historically added together to infant formula. This study investigated the impact of ARA or DHA supplementation alone or in combination on tissue FA incorporation, immune responses, and neurodevelopment in the young pig. Methods: Male pigs (N = 48 total) received one of four dietary treatments from postnatal day (PND) 2 to 30. Treatments targeted the following ARA/DHA levels (% of total FA): CON (0.00/0.00), ARA (0.80/0.00), DHA (0.00/0.80), and ARA DHA (0.80/0.80). Plasma, red blood cells (RBC), and prefrontal cortex (PFC) were collected for FA analysis. Blood was collected for T cell immunophenotyping and to quantify a panel of immune outcomes. Myelin thickness in the corpus callosum was measured by transmission electron microscopy and pig movement was measured by actigraphy. Results: There were no differences in formula intake or growth between dietary groups. DHA supplementation increased brain DHA, but decreased ARA, compared with all other groups. ARA supplementation increased brain ARA compared with all other groups but did not affect brain DHA. Combined supplementation increased brain DHA levels but did not affect brain ARA levels compared with the control. Pigs fed ARA or ARA DHA exhibited more activity than those fed CON or DHA. Diet-dependent differences in activity suggested pigs fed ARA had the lowest percent time asleep, while those fed DHA had the highest. No differences were observed for immune or myelination outcomes. Conclusion: Supplementation with ARA and DHA did not differentially affect immune responses, but ARA levels in RBC and PFC were reduced when DHA was provided without ARA. Supplementation of either ARA or DHA alone induced differences in time spent asleep, and ARA inclusion increased general activity. Therefore, the current data support the combined supplementation with both ARA and DHA in infant formula and raise questions regarding the safety and nutritional suitability of ARA or DHA supplementation individually.
机译:背景:人乳含有花生素酸(ARA)和二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)。用ARA和DHA补充婴幼儿配方粉末(FA)曲线,内部喂养婴儿中的神经发育结果和免疫应答,这些婴儿更像在母乳喂养婴儿中观察到的那些。因此,ARA和DHA已经历史上添加到婴儿配方中。本研究调查了ARA或DHA补充的影响单独或组合组织FA掺入,免疫应答和幼猪中的神经发作。方法:雄性猪(N = 48总计)从后期(PND)2至30中获得四种膳食治疗中的一种。治疗靶向以下ARA / DHA水平(总FA的百分比):CON(0.00 / 0.00),ARA( 0.80 / 0.00),DHA(0.00 / 0.80)和ARA DHA(0.80 / 0.80)。收集血浆,红细胞(RBC)和前额叶皮质(PFC)进行FA分析。收集血液以进行T细胞免疫蛋白酶型,并定量免疫结果组。通过透射电子显微镜测量Corpus胼um中的髓鞘厚度,并通过致光测量猪运动。结果:膳食群之间的配方摄入量或增长没有差异。 DHA补充脑DHA增加,但ara减少,与所有其他组相比。与所有其他群体相比,ARA补充脑ARA增加,但不影响脑DHA。联合补充剂增加了脑DHA水平,但与对照相比,脑ARA水平不影响。饲喂ARA或ARA DHA的猪展出了比Fed Con或DHA更多的活动。活动的饮食差异建议饲喂ARA的猪睡眠时间最低,而喂养DHA的时间最高。免疫或髓鞘结果没有观察到差异。结论:用ARA和DHA补充没有差异地影响免疫应答,但在没有ARA的情况下提供DHA时,RBC和PFC的ARA水平降低。补充ARA或DHA单独诱导的时间睡眠时间,并且ARA包涵体增加了一般活动。因此,目前的数据支持婴儿配方中ARA和DHA的组合补充,并对单独的ARA或DHA补充的安全性和营养适宜性提出问题。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号