...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal >Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24?h period
【24h】

Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24?h period

机译:常规HOLTER和新型车态ECG系统使用补丁和Android应用程序的心律失常检测比较,超过24?H期

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) is done for evaluation of arrhythmia. Commonly used AECG system is 24 hour Holter. Patch based second generation AECG monitoring devices, which can record for longer periods, are now available.OBJECTIVE:Android App Based WebCardio using WiPatch is a new AECG system which records ECG in two leads for 72 hours. Our study compared the arrhythmia detection by WebCardio and conventional Holter by simultaneously connecting both for 24 hours in patients having indication for AECG.METHODS:The AECG of patients who had simultaneous recording with WebCardio and conventional Holter, in the department of Cardiology, Medical College, Thrissur were evaluated. Ability to detect any of the 6 arrhythmias -1) atrial fibrillation (AF), 2) atrioventricular (AV) block, 3) sinus pause of 3 seconds (SP), 4) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 5) premature ventricular complex (PVC) and 6) ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) was compared. Detection of each arrhythmia was also compared.RESULTS:141 patients had simultaneous recordings by both systems of AECG. The WebCardio picked up at least one of the 6 arrhythmias; AF, AV block, SP, SVT, PVC or VT/VF in 98 cases compared to 88 in the Holter (McNemars test, two tail P= 0.006). In eleven cases WebCardio detected an arrhythmia where Holter could not. In one case Holter identified an arrhythmia and WebCardio could not. Individual arrhythmias; AF, SP, SVT and VT/VF were detected equally by both systems. AV block (23 Vs 18, p=0.0625) and PVCs (83 Vs 74, p=0.0636) were detected in more number of cases in WebCardio. In the five cases where WebCardio alone identified AV block, four had poor quality of P wave in the Holter.CONCLUSION:Arrhythmia was picked up in more number of patients by the WebCardio compared to Holter. This was due to higher pickup of AV block and PVCs by WebCardio. Difference in AV block identification was due to better quality of P in WebCardio. WebCardio is a good alternative to Holter for AECG.Copyright ? 2019 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:采取动态心电图(AECG)进行用于评估心律失常。常用的AECG系统是24小时拿着。 Patch基第二代AECG监视设备现在可用。使用Wipatch的Android应用程序基于Android应用程序是一个新的AECG系统,它会在两个引线中记录ECG 72小时。我们的研究比较了WebCardio和常规HOLTER的心律失常检测,同时在表达AECG.Methods的患者中同时连接24小时:在医学院心脏病学系同时录制的患者AECG,评估Thrissur。能够检测到6例心律失常-1的任何一个心房颤动(AF),2)区域(AV)嵌段,3)窦暂停> 3秒(SP),4)Suprackulary心动过速(SVT),5)过早心室复合物(PVC)和6)比较心室心动过速(VT)/心室纤维化(VF)。比较了每种心律失常的检测。结果:141名患者通过AECG系统同时录制。 WebCardio拾起了6个心律失常中的至少一个; 98个案例中的AF,AV块,SP,SVT,PVC或VT / VF在孔中的88中(McNemars测试,两条尾P = 0.006)。在11例案例中,WebCardio检测到洞穴不能的心律失常。在一个案例中,Holter确定了心律失常和Webcardio无法。个体心律失常;两个系统同样地检测到AF,SP,SVT和VT / VF。在WebCardio中的更多情况下,检测到AV块(23 Vs 18,P = 0.0625)和PVC(83 Vs 74,p = 0.0636)。在单独识别的AV块的五个案例中,孔中的四个P波的质量差。结论:与HOWERIO相比,WebCardio以更多数量的患者拿起心律失常。这是由于WebCardio更高的AV块和PVC的拾音器。 AV块识别的差异是由于WebCardio中的P更好的质量。 WebCardio是一个很好的替代品为AECG.COPYRIGHT? 2019年印度心律社会。 Elsevier B.V的生产和托管。保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号