...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in physiology education >Impact of readiness assurance process and faculty feedback on individual application exercises: a model for continuous assessment in physiology
【24h】

Impact of readiness assurance process and faculty feedback on individual application exercises: a model for continuous assessment in physiology

机译:准备就绪保障过程和教师反馈对个体申请练习的影响:生理学持续评估模型

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study is aimed at the implementation of a continuous assessment model in physiology for a large-enrollment classroom with 250 students. The readiness assurance process (RAP) and immediate feedback elements from team-based learning (TBL) methodology were adopted to test their ability to guide students to solve applications exercises individually. Three continuous assessments in physiology (CAPs) were conducted with the RAP to include individual (iRAT) and group readiness assurance tests (gRAT). Immediate feedback was provided with faculty-student discussion (FSD), and the individual application exercises (iAE) were designed to be answered individually. Each CAP was subjected to three types of experimental manipulation in subgroups created out of 250 students. The intervention began with iRAT for all three subgroups. The sequence of iRAT, gRAT, FSD, and iAE varied between subgroups within a CAP. In a cross-over study design, each subgroup of students was subjected to all three intervention types over three CAPs. The subgroup completing iAE after RAP and FSD showed higher scores than the subgroup with RAP alone. One hundred eight-two students (82.35% response rate; 101 women and 81 men) responded to the questionnaire. The majority of students (87.4%) felt that doing iRAT and gRAT at the beginning helped them to solve iAE better. Most of the students (86.8%) responded that they received useful feedback and clarification during the discussion with the teacher after the gRAT. In conclusion, the administration of iRAT first followed by gRAT and immediate feedback from faculty seem to be beneficial to prepare students to tackle application-based exercises.
机译:本研究旨在实施具有250名学生的大型入学课堂的生理学持续评估模型。采用基于团队的学习(TBL)方法的准备保证程序(RAP)和即时反馈元素来测试他们指导学生单独解决应用程序的能力。用RAP进行了三次在生理学(上限)中的连续评估,包括个体(陶衣伊拉特)和组准备保证测试(GRAT)。立即反馈与教师学生讨论(FSD)提供,个人申请练习(IAE)旨在单独回答。每个帽都经过250名学生创建的亚组中的三种类型的实验操纵。干预率先用伊拉特为所有三个亚组。帽子内的亚组之间的序列,GRAT,FSD和IAE之间的序列变化。在交叉的研究设计中,每个学生的子组都经过三个帽子的所有三种干预类型。在RAP和FSD之后完成IAE的亚组比单独唱的亚组显示出更高的分数。一百八二人学生(82.35%的响应率; 101名女性和81名男子)回应问卷。大多数学生(87.4%)觉得在开始时做了陶衣和牢骚帮助他们更好地解决了IAE。大多数学生(86.8%)回答说,他们在牢记后与老师讨论期间收到有用的反馈和澄清。总之,德拉特的管理首先,首先是克拉特和教师的直接反馈似乎有利于准备学生以解决基于申请的练习。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号