...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on survival benefit in prostate cancer patients with a risk of lymph node invasion 5%: a propensity score matching analysis from SEER database
【24h】

Pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on survival benefit in prostate cancer patients with a risk of lymph node invasion 5%: a propensity score matching analysis from SEER database

机译:盆腔淋巴结解剖及其对前列腺癌患者的生存益处的程度,具有淋巴结入侵的风险> 5%:SEER数据库的倾向评分匹配分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the gold standard for nodal staging in PCa and is recommended for patients with a probability of lymph node invasion (LNI) 5%. However, the therapeutic role of PLND and its extent remains a debate. In this study, data of 20,668 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) with and without PLND from SEER database between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had a risk of LNI 5% according to 2012-Briganti nomogram. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between patients with and without PLND. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to evaluate the impacts of the PLND and its extent on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). In overall cohort, patients with PLND were associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics and had poorer survival compared to those without PLND (5-year CSS rate: 98.4% vs. 99.7%, p??0.001; 5-year OS rate: 96.3% vs. 97.8%, p??0.001). In the post-PSM cohort, no significant difference in survival was found between patients with and without PLND (5-year CSS rate: 99.4% vs. 99.7%, p?=?0.479; 5-year OS rate: 97.3% vs. 97.8%, p?=?0.204). In addition, the extent of PLND had no impact on prognosis (all p??0.05). Subgroup analyses reported similar negative findings. In conclusion, neither PLND nor its extent was associated with survival in North American patients with a risk of LNI 5%. The cut-off point of 5% probability of LNI might be too low to show benefits in survival in patients underwent PLND.
机译:盆腔淋巴结解剖(PLND)代表PCA中节清分期的金标准,建议用于淋巴结侵袭(LNI)> 5%概率的患者。然而,PLND的治疗作用及其程度仍然是辩论。在本研究中,回顾性分析了2010年至2015年间自由基前列腺切除术(RP)和没有PLND的自由基前列腺切除术(RP)的数据。根据2012年 - Briganti Nom图,所有患者均具有LNI> 5%的风险。进行倾向得分匹配(PSM)以进行患者之间的平衡基线特征,无需PLND。 Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归用于评估PLND的影响及其对癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总体存活(OS)的影响。在整体队列中,PLND患者与更具侵袭性的临床病理特征有关,与没有PLND的人(5年CSS率为98.4%率为99.7%,P?<0.001; 5年的OS率:96.3 %vs. 97.8%,p?<?0.001)。在PSM队列中,没有PLND的患者之间没有发现存活率没有显着差异(5年CSS率:99.4%与99.7%,P?= 0.479; 5年的OS率:97.3%VS. 97.8%,p?= 0.204)。此外,PLND的程度对预后没有影响(所有P?> 0.05)。子组分析报告了类似的负面调查结果。总之,PLND也没有程度,北美患者的生存患者有5%的风险。 LNI 5%概率的截止点可能太低,不能显示出PLND患者的存活中的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号