首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Measurement of Resting Energy Expenditure with Indirect Calorimetry and Predictive Equations in Healthy Young Adults: A Cross Sectional Study
【24h】

Measurement of Resting Energy Expenditure with Indirect Calorimetry and Predictive Equations in Healthy Young Adults: A Cross Sectional Study

机译:用间接热量测定和健康年轻成人的预测方程测量静止能量支出:横截面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) is the main determinant of energy requirements. An inaccurate estimation of REE can lead to the over or under-prediction of energy requirements. Indirect calorimetry is considered as the gold standard for the assessment of REE. The most of the predictive equations which are formed are from the studies conducted on Caucasian people while on Asian population these studies are very limited.Aim: To compare the REE measured by indirect calorimetry and predictive equation in healthy young adults.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was done on 100 healthy young adult participants from November 2018 to May 2019, of age group 18 to 25 years to measure REE using indirect calorimetry and predictive equations (Harris-Benedict’s, Schofield, FAO/WHO/UNU and Mifflin-St. Jeor equations). Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 16.0. Unpaired student t-test for comparison of data and Bland Altman test to check for validity of predictive equations were applied.Results: The mean value of REE using Indirect calorimetry was 1994.20±577.33 and that of using four Harris-Benedict’s, Schofield, FAO/WHO/UNU and Mifflin-St.Jeor equations were 1638.15±335.64 kcal/day, 1636.21±359.85 kcal/day, 1636.93±367.59 kcal/day and 1582.41±251.29 kcal/day, respectively. Thus, the highest mean difference between values of REE obtained using predictive equation and indirect calorimetry was 411.79±326.04 kcal/day with respect to Mifflin-St.Jeorand’s and the lowest mean difference was 356.05±241.69 kcal/day with respect to Herris Benedict’s equation.Conclusion: Predictive equations underestimated the REE of young adults when compared with that measured by indirect calorimetry.
机译:休息能源支出(REE)是能源需求的主要决定因素。对REE的不准确估计可以导致能量要求的过度或欠预测。间接量热法被认为是对REE评估的金标准。形成的大多数预测方程来自在白种人人口上进行的研究,而在亚洲人口上这些研究非常有限。目的:将通过间接量热法测量的REE与健康的年轻成人的预测方程进行比较。材料和方法:从2018年11月到2019年5月的100个健康年轻成人参与者在2019年5月到25年来完成横断面研究,以使用间接量热法和预测方程式测量REE(Harris-Benedict's,Schofield,Fao /谁/ UNU和MIFFLIN-ST。厌恶方程式)。使用SPSS版本16.0进行统计分析。应用了用于检查预测方程的有效性的数据和Bland Altman测试的未配对学生T检验。结果:使用间接量热法的REE的平均值为1994.20±577.33,使用四个哈里斯 - 本尼迪克特,斯基伐,粮农组织/谁/ UNU和MIFFLIN-ST.JEOR方程为1638.15±335.64千卡/天,1636.21±359.85千卡/天,1636.93±367.59千卡/天,分别为1582.41±251.29千卡/天。因此,使用预测方程和间接量热法获得的REE值之间的最高平均差异为mifflin-st.jeorand的411.79±326.04千卡/日,最低平均差异为356.05±241.69千卡/日相对于Herris Benedict的公式。结论:与间接量热法测量的相比,预测方程低估了年轻成年人的REE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号