...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Efficacy and Comparison of 256-Slice Dual Source CT Angiography with Catheter Coronary Angiography at Different Heart Rates without using Beta Blockers
【24h】

Efficacy and Comparison of 256-Slice Dual Source CT Angiography with Catheter Coronary Angiography at Different Heart Rates without using Beta Blockers

机译:256切片双源CT血管造影在不同心率下用β受体率不同心脏血管造影的疗效和比较

获取原文

摘要

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in India as well as worldwide. CT angiography is an excellent imaging modality for evaluation of CAD. Previous studies with 64 or lesser slice CT scanner have failed to show consistent and optimal Image Quality (IQ) at Heart Rate (HR) more than 70 bpm and required beta blockers.Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 256-slice Dual Source CT Angiography (DSCTA) in comparison with Catheter Coronary Angiography (CCA) in evaluation of Coronary Arteries (CA) in patients with clinical suspicion of CAD and to study its effectiveness at higher HR without using beta blockers.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients (n=46) with suspected CAD using ECG triggered 256-slice Dual Source Computed Tomography (DSCT) over a period of nine months. Patients were sub grouped according to HR (Group I: 50-70 (18 patients), Group II: 71-90 (24 patients) and Group III ≥91 (8 patients). A total of 48% patients had HR of 71-90 bpm while 16% had HR ≥91 bpm. Scan protocols included prospective ECG triggering (HR 75 bpm). CA segments were analysed for IQ on a 4 point scale (1 is worst while 4 is best) by two independent readers who were blinded to the patient details. Accuracy to detect significant luminal stenosis was correlated with CCA (gold standard). Statistical significance of the study was established by Chi-square test (p<0.05).Results: The mean HR and Standard Deviation (SD) in the study was 76±13.7 bpm (range 54-105). Out of 675 CA segments analysed mean IQ score and SD in medium (71-90 bpm) and high HR (≥91 bpm) groups were 3.55±0.62 and 3.25±0.62 which were comparable to IQ in low HR group (3.84±0.36). This indicates excellent IQ even at HR of ≥91 bpm (p<0.05). The mean IQ score of entire study group was 3.88±0.33. Right Coronary artery (RCA) showed best IQ score in each category followed by Left Anterior Descending (LAD) and Left Circumflex (LCX). Inter-observer agreement analysis was performed using Kappa analysis to determine agreement between DSCTA readers. Kappa values for low, medium and high HR groups were 0.866, 0.842 and 0.836. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and accuracy for detecting significant stenosis in medium and high HR groups were 95%, 99.2%, 98.4%, 98.7%, 98.9% and 94.3%, 98.9%, 96.9%, 97.6%, 97.9%, respectively.Conclusion: 256-slice DSCTA is a reliable technique with high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for assessment of CA even at higher HR without using beta blockers.
机译:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是印度的发病率和死亡率的主要原因和全世界。 CT血管造影是用于评估CAD的优异成像模式。前面的64或更小的切片CT扫描仪的研究未能以超过70bpm的心率(HR)显示一致和最佳的图像质量(IQ),并要求β受体阻滞剂。目的:评估256切片的诊断准确性双源CT血管造影(DSCTA)与导管冠状动脉血管造影(CCA)进行评价CAD临床怀疑患者冠状动脉(CA),并在不使用β受体阻滞的情况下在较高人力时间研究其有效性。材料和方法:使用ECG触发的256切片双源计算断层扫描(DSCT)在九个月内进行疑似CAD,对患者进行(n = 46)进行这种横截面研究。患者根据人力资源进行亚分组(第I族:50-70名(18名患者),II组:71-90(24名患者)和III族≥91(8名患者)。共有48%的患者有71岁90 bpm虽然16%的HR≥91bpm。扫描协议包括潜在的ECG触发(HR 75 BPM)。由两个被盲目的两个独立读者分析了IQ的IQ段的CA段(1是最糟糕的)患者的细节。检测显着腔静脉曲张的准确性与CCA(金标准)相关。Chi-Square试验建立了该研究的统计学意义(P <0.05)。结果:平均人力资源和标准偏差(研究中的SD)是76±13.7bpm(范围54-105)。在675个CA段中分析了平均IQ得分,中等(71-90bpm)和高HR(≥91bpm)组的SD为3.55±0.62 3.25±0.62与低HR组中的IQ相当(3.84±0.36)。即使在≥91bpm的人权时,这也表明了优异的IQ(P <0.05)。整个研究组的平均IQ得分为3.88±0.33。右键整体动脉(RCA)在每个类别中显示出最佳IQ得分,然后是左前期下降(LAD)和左侧恒定(LCX)。使用Kappa分析进行观察者间协议分析,以确定DSCTA读者之间的协议。低,中高HR组的Kappa值为0.866,0.842和0.836。敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值(PPV),用于检测中高中和高中群体的显着狭窄,95%,99.2%,98.4%,98.7%,98.9%和94.3%,98.9分别为96.9%,97.6%,97.9%。结论:256切片DSCTA是一种可靠的技术,具有高灵敏度,特异性,PPV和NPV,即使在较高的人小时内也可以在不使用β受体阻滞剂的情况下进行CA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号