...
首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering: Theory, Methods and Applications >Forensic Speaker Comparison Using Evidence Interval in Full Bayesian Significance Test
【24h】

Forensic Speaker Comparison Using Evidence Interval in Full Bayesian Significance Test

机译:法医扬声器比较使用贝叶斯意识测试中的证据间隔进行比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper describes the application of a full Bayesian significance test (FBST) to compute evidence intervals in forensic speaker comparison (FSC). In the FBST approach, the challenge is to apply the test to a large number of observations and to formulate an equation to solve the test quickly. The contribution of the present work is that it proposes an application of the FBST to FSC and develops a method to calculate the FBST for the distribution of expected values (mean) with unknown variance without using Monte Carlo Markov chains (MCMC). Comparisons with other interval inference methodologies indicate that the evidence interval size is 49% greater than that computed with the Gosset approach. The evidence interval presented 71% fewer classification errors than the punctual inference did for the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 17?dB.
机译:本文介绍了全贝叶斯意义测试(FBST)的应用来计算法医扬声器比较(FSC)中的证据间隔。在FBST方法中,挑战是将测试应用于大量观察,并制定快速解决测试的等式。本作工作的贡献是,它提出了FBST到FSC的应用,并开发一种方法来计算FBST,用于计算预期值的分布(平均值),而不使用蒙特卡罗马尔可夫链(MCMC)。与其他间隔推理方法的比较表明,证据间隔大小比以门全文方法计算的值为49%。证据间隔呈现出比17?dB的信噪比(SNR)的准时推断较少的分类误差减少了71%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号