首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Association of Low Luminance Questionnaire With Objective Functional Measures in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration
【24h】

Association of Low Luminance Questionnaire With Objective Functional Measures in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration

机译:低亮度问卷与早期和中等年龄相关黄斑变性的客观函数措施的关联

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine whether Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) scores are associated with objective measures of visual function in early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Cross-sectional study of subjects with early AMD Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) stage 2, N = 33), intermediate AMD (AREDS stage 3, N = 47), and age-matched healthy controls (N = 21). Subjects were interviewed with the LLQ. Psychophysical tests performed included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mesopic microperimetry, dark adaptometry (DA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), and cone contrast test (CCT). Low luminance deficit (LLD) was the difference in the number of letters read under photopic versus low luminance settings. The relationship between LLQ and visual function test scores was assessed with linear regression. Results: Subjects with intermediate AMD had significantly lower LLQ composite scores (mean = 75.8 ?± 16.7; median = 76, range [29, 97]) compared with early AMD (mean = 85.3 ?± 13.3; median = 88, range [50, 100], P = 0.007) or controls (mean = 91.4 ?± 6.5; median = 94, range [79, 99], P 0.001) in the overall cohort. LLQ composite scores were associated with computerized BCVA (?2 = 0.516), computerized LLVA at two background luminance (1.3 cd/m2, ?2 = 0.660; 0.5 cd/m2, ?2 = 0.489) along with their respective computerized LLDs (?2 = a??0.531 and a??0.467), rod intercept (?2 = a??0.312), and CCT green (?2 = 0.183) (all P 0.05). Only the computerized LLVAs and computerized LLDs remained statistically significant after adjusting for AMD versus control status (P 0.05). Among AMD subjects, LLQ composite scores were significantly associated with the computerized LLVAs (?2 = 0.622 and 0.441) and LLDs (?2 = a??0.795 and a??0.477) at both the 1.3 and 0.5 cd/m2 luminance levels, respectively, and these associations remained significant after adjusting for AMD severity (P 0.05). Conclusions: Among subjects with early and intermediate AMD, LLQ scores were significantly associated with computerized LLVA and LLD. LLQ is a useful patient-centered functional measure of visual impairment in early and intermediate AMD.
机译:目的:确定低亮度问卷(LLQ)分数是否与早期和中等年龄相关黄斑变性(AMD)的视觉功能的客观措施相关。方法:对早期AMD年龄相关眼病研究(AREDS)第2阶段2,N = 33),中间体(AREDS第3,N = 47)的横截面研究,和年龄匹配的健康对照(n = 21 )。受试者接受了LLQ。进行的心理物理测试包括最佳校正的视力(BCVA),中间体微仪,深色调节(DA),低亮度视力(LLVA)和锥对比度测试(CCT)。低亮度赤字(LLD)是在光电键值与低亮度设置下读取的字母数的差异。利用线性回归评估LLQ与可视化功能测试分数之间的关系。结果:中间体AMD的受试者显着降低了LLQ复合分数(平均值= 75.8?±16.7;中位= 76,范围[29,97])(平均值= 85.3?±13.3;中位= 88,范围[50 ,P = 0.007)或对照(平均值= 91.4±6.5;中位= 94,范围[79,99],P <0.001)在整体队列中。 LLQ综合分数与计算机BCVA(α2= 0.516)相关联,电脑LLVA在两个背景亮度(1.3CD / M2,?2 = 0.660; 0.5cd / M2,?2 = 0.489)以及其各自的计算机化的LLD(? 2 = a ?? 0.531和a ?? 0.467),棒截距(?2 = a ?? 0.312),Cct绿色(α2= 0.183)(所有P <0.05)。只有计算机化的LLVAS和计算机化的LLD在调整AMD与控制状态(P <0.05)后仍保持统计学意义(P <0.05)。在AMD受试者中,在1.3和0.5cd / M2亮度水平,LLQ复合分数明显与计算机LLVA(Δ2= 0.622和0.441)和LLD(α2= a ?? 0.795和a-0.477)显着相关,分别在调整AMD严重程度后,这些关联仍然显着(P <0.05)。结论:具有早期和中间AMD的受试者,LLQ分数与计算机LLVA和LLD显着相关。 LLQ是一个有用的患者以早期和中间AMD在中间视力障碍功能衡量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号