...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >COVID toes: Where do we stand with the current evidence?
【24h】

COVID toes: Where do we stand with the current evidence?

机译:covid脚趾:我们在哪里符合目前的证据?

获取原文

摘要

Background Numerous cases of chilblains have been observed, mainly in young subjects with no or mild symptoms compatible with COVID-19. The pathophysiology of these lesions is still widely debated, and an association with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unconfirmed. Objectives This paper focuses on the unresolved issues about these COVID toes and, in particular, whether or not they are associated with COVID-19. Arguments The temporal link between the outbreak of chilblains and the COVID-19 pandemic suggests a link between the two events. Positive anti-SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 immunostaining on skin biopsy of chilblains seems to confirm the presence of the virus in the lesions but lacks specificity and must be interpreted with caution. Conversely, RT-PCR and anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology were negative in the majority of patients with chilblains. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 infection can be excluded, with relative certainty, even after accounting for possible lower immunization in mild/asymptomatic patients and for some differences in sensitivity/specificity between the tests used. Some authors hypothesize that chilblains could be the cutaneous expression of a strong type I interferon (IFN-I) response. High production of IFN-I is suggested to be associated with early viral control and may suppress antibody response. However, the absence of other cutaneous or extracutaneous symptoms, as observed in other interferonopathies, raises unanswered questions. To date, a direct link between chilblains and COVID-19 still seems impossible to confirm. A more indirect association due to lifestyle changes induced by lockdown is a possible explanation. Improvement of chilblains when protective measures were adopted and after lifting of lockdown supports this hypothesis. Conclusion Conflicting current evidence highlights the need for systematic and repeated testing of larger numbers of patients and the need for valid follow-up data that take into consideration epidemic curves and evolution of lockdown measures.
机译:背景,已经观察到许多乳白病例,主要是在没有与Covid-19兼容的患有无或轻度症状的年轻受试者中。这些病变的病理生理学仍然是广泛的争论,与SARS-COV-2感染的关联仍未被证实。目标本文重点介绍了关于这些Covid脚趾的未解决问题,特别是它们是否与Covid-19相关联。争论冻结和Covid-19大流行之间的时间链接建议两个事件之间的联系。脊髓皮肤活检的正抗SARS-COV / SARS-COV-2免疫染色似乎确认病毒在病变中的存在,但缺乏特异性,并且必须谨慎地解释。相反,RT-PCR和抗SARS-COV-2血清学在大多数乳白患者中是阴性的。因此,即使在核算中可能降低温和/无症状患者的较低免疫,也可以排除SARS-COV-2感染,即使在轻度/无症状患者中可能降低免疫,也可以在使用的测试之间的敏感性/特异性差异。一些作者假设乳酸可能是强型I干扰素(IFN-I)反应的皮肤表达。建议使用IFN-1的高生产与早期病毒对照相关,并且可以抑制抗体反应。然而,如在其他干涉病变中所观察到的那样,没有其他皮肤或剥皮症状,提高了未答复的问题。迄今为止,拒绝和Covid-19之间的直接联系似乎是不可能的确认。由于锁定引起的生活方式变化,更加间接的关联是可能的解释。采用保护措施及锁定后的闭锁后,冻土的改善支持这一假设。结论电流相互矛盾的证据突出了对大量患者的系统和重复测试的需求以及需要考虑流行病曲线和锁定措施的演变的有效后续数据的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号