首页> 外文期刊>Astronomy and astrophysics >Is near-surface ice the driver of dust activity on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
【24h】

Is near-surface ice the driver of dust activity on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

机译:近地表冰在67p / churyumov-gerasimenko上的灰尘活动司机

获取原文
           

摘要

Context. Mainly for historical reasons, nearly all of the current thermophysical models of dust activity rely on the poorly justified assumption of cohesionless dust lifted by a gas drag force against the weak nucleus gravity. The interpretation of Rosetta data and our understanding of comet activity is particularly sensitive to this assumption. Aims. We investigate the role that cohesion forces among the dust grains play in the evolution of temperature and pressure at the ice-dust interface and the resulting dust activity (lifting). Methods. We used a 1D thermophysical numerical model that provides a realistic description of cohesion forces among dust aggregates. Several conditions of solar illumination on the nucleus are investigated for the H _(2) O, CO, and CO _(2) ices below the dust layer. We examine a wide range of dust grain sizes. Results. The simulations confirm an increase in temperature and pressure at the ice boundary between the two model layers with respect to exposed pure ice. Furthermore, we show that a non-monotonic behavior of temperature and pressure versus layer thickness is expected at the ice-dust interface for fine aggregates (of sizes ≤ 30 μ m), but not for the larger grains. The ratio of vapor pressure to the physically determined tensile strength for various agglomerate sizes and layer thicknesses provides further evidence that the gas drag is not sufficient to remove dust grains of sizes & 1 mm, which is a result of taking cohesion forces among the particles into account. Conclusions. In the framework of the presented model, which can be considered common in terms of assumptions and physical parameters in the cometary community, the dust removal by a gas drag force is not a plausible physical mechanism. The sublimation of not only water ice, but also of super-volatile ice (i.e., CO) is unable to remove dust grains for illumination conditions corresponding to 1.3 AU. A way out of this impasse requires revision of the most common model assumption employed by the cometary community.
机译:语境。主要是出于历史原因,几乎所有目前的灰尘活动的热神族模型都依赖于通过气体阻力抗弱核重力所剥离的无粘性粉尘的良好合理的假设。对Rosetta数据的解释及我们对彗星活动的理解对这一假设特别敏感。目标。我们调查粉尘谷物之间的凝聚力在冰尘界面处的温度和压力的演变中起作用的作用以及所得到的粉尘活性(提升)。方法。我们使用了一个1D热物理数值模型,其提供了粉尘聚集体之间的内聚力的现实描述。对粉尘层下方的H _(2)O,CO,CO,CO和CO _(2)ICES研究了核上的若干太阳能照射的条件。我们研究了各种灰尘尺寸。结果。模拟确认了两种模型层相对于暴露的纯冰之间的冰边的温度和压力的增加。此外,我们表明,预期温度和压力与层厚度的非单调行为在冰灰尘界面(尺寸≤30μm),但不是较大的晶粒。对于各种附聚尺寸和层厚度的物理测定的拉伸强度与物理测定的拉伸强度的比率提供了进一步的证据,即气体阻力不足以去除尺寸的灰尘颗粒1毫米,这是考虑颗粒之间的内聚力。结论。在所呈现的模型的框架中,可以在进行中的假设和物理参数方面认为是常见的,气体阻力的除尘不是合理的物理机制。不仅浇水的升华,也是超挥发性冰(即,CO)不能去除对应于1.3 Au的照明条件的灰尘晶粒。这种僵局的方式需要修改Cometry社区采用的最常见的模型假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号