...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Evaluating the Evidence: Is Neurolysis or Neurectomy a Better Treatment for Occipital Neuralgia?
【24h】

Evaluating the Evidence: Is Neurolysis or Neurectomy a Better Treatment for Occipital Neuralgia?

机译:评估证据:是神经溶解的还是神经切除术,更好地治疗枕腔内痛吗?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Occipital neuralgia, a neuropathy of the occipital nerves, can cause significant pain and distress, resulting in a decrease in the patient’s quality of life. Options for surgical treatment involve transection or decompression of the greater and lesser occipital nerves. Current evidence provides no clear consensus regarding one technique over the other. Here, we present a systematic review of the literature to potentially answer this question. Eligible studies compared neurolysis versus neurectomy for the treatment of occipital neuralgia after failure of conservative therapy. Our outcome of interest was resolution of symptoms. We performed a search of MEDLINE/PubMed and Ovid from inception to 2019. Eligible studies included the words "occipital neuralgia" and "surgery."?All studies comparing neurolysis to neurectomy were included in the analysis. None of the studies identified were randomized control trials. Each study was evaluated by two independent researchers who assigned a level of evidence according to the American Association of Neurology (AAN) algorithm. Data extracted included mechanism of surgery?(neurolysis or neurectomy), resolution of pain symptoms, and length of follow-up. Each study was level IV evidence. After reviewing the data, there was insufficient evidence to recommend one method of treatment over the other. This inconclusive result highlights the importance of a national registry to compare outcomes between the two treatment modalities.
机译:枕骨神经痛是枕骨神经的神经病变,会造成显着的痛苦和痛苦,导致患者的生活质量降低。手术治疗的选择涉及越来越大的枕骨神经的横向或减压。目前的证据不明确达成关于其他技术的共识。在这里,我们对文献提供了系统审查,以潜在地回答这个问题。符合条件的研究与保守治疗失败后的治疗枕骨神经痛的神经溶解与神经切除术。我们兴趣的结果是解决症状。我们从2009年开始搜索了Medline / Pubmed和Ovid。符合条件的研究包括“枕脑神经痛”词语和“手术”。所有研究均包含在分析中纳入神经辐射对神经切除术的研究。没有确定的研究是随机对照试验。每项研究由两个独立的研究人员评估,他们根据美国神经病学(AAN)算法协会分配了一定程度的证据。提取数据包括手术机制?(神经溶解或神经切除术),疼痛症状的分辨率,以及随访时间。每项研究都是IV级证据。在审查数据后,没有足够的证据来推荐一个对另一个治疗方法。这种不确定的结果强调了国家登记处的重要性,以比较两种治疗方式之间的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号