首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Analysis of the Relapse Rates of the Primary Closure and Limberg Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery
【24h】

Analysis of the Relapse Rates of the Primary Closure and Limberg Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

机译:初级闭合和利姆尔突襟技术的复发速率分析窦手术

获取原文
           

摘要

Background This study aimed to assess the relapse rates at the long-term follow-up of the Limberg flap repair (LFR) and primary closure (PC) methods in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). Methods The records of primary PSDs who underwent LFR and PC due to PSD were retrospectively examined. The study included?patients whose surgical intervention was performed at least two years ago. The patients were contacted by phone to obtain information. They were asked whether they had a relapse or not, and their answers were recorded. The recording and analysis were ensured using the SPSS statistical program (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, US). The groups were compared using the chi-square test. p?0.05 was considered significant. Results The patients’ mean age was 23.68 ± 8.21 years, and their median age was 22 years. The overall follow-up period was 4.38 ± 2.12 years. LFR-treated patients numbered 292;?38 (13.01%) females and 254 (86.99%) males. Of the LFR-treated patients, 23 (7.87%) had a relapse, including five (13.15%) females and 18 (7.08%) males (p?0.03). PC-treated patients numbered 184; 58 (31.52%) females and 126 (68.48%) males. Of PC-treated patients, 39 (21.19%) had a relapse, including 15 (25.86%) females and 24 (19.04%) males (p?0.04). The relapse was more than three times higher in PC when compared to LFR (p?0.01). Conclusion LFR clearly takes precedence over PC. In both methods, the relapse rate is higher in females. We believe that this is due to our tendency to be more limited in resection in women.
机译:背景技术本研究旨在评估Limberg PLAP修复(LFR)和初级闭合(PC)方法的长期随访中的复发率(PSD)的手术治疗。方法回顾性检查了由于PSD而接受LFR和PC的主要PSD的记录。该研究包括在内的患者至少两年前的手术干预。患者通过电话联系以获取信息。他们被问到他们是否经过复发,并记录了他们的答案。使用SPSS统计程序(IBM Corp,Armonk,Ny,US)确保了记录和分析。使用Chi-Square测试进行比较这些组。 p?0.05被认为是显着的。结果患者的平均年龄为23.68±8.21岁,中位年龄为22年。整体随访期为4.38±2.12年。 LFR治疗的患者编号为292;?38(13.01%)女性和254名(86.99%)男性。在LFR治疗的患者中,23例(7.87%)复发,包括五(13.15%)的女性和18名(7.08%)男性(P?0.03)。 PC治疗的患者编号为184; 58(31.52%)女性和126名(68.48%)男性。 PC治疗的患者,39例(21.19%)复发,包括15名(25.86%)的女性和24名(19.04%)男性(P?0.04)。与LFR相比,PC的复发在PC较高三倍(P?0.01)。结论LFR明确优先于PC。在这两种方法中,雌性的复发率较高。我们认为这是由于我们在妇女切除中更有限的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号