首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Adaptation of Cast Ni-Cr Copings, Direct Metal Laser Sintering Co-Cr Copings, and Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Zr Copings: An In-vitro Study
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Adaptation of Cast Ni-Cr Copings, Direct Metal Laser Sintering Co-Cr Copings, and Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Zr Copings: An In-vitro Study

机译:铸造Ni-Cr调封边缘适应的比较评价,直接金属激光烧结CO-CR应对,计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造ZR应对:体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and purpose Marginal adaptation is critical for the long-term longevity and clinical success of dental restorations. Improper marginal adaptation may lead to oral fluids, resulting in microleakage and cement dissolution. The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the marginal adaptation of nickel-chrome (Ni-Cr) copings,?cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) coping, and zirconium (Zr) copings, produced with different manufacturing procedures. Material and methods A total of 45 copings were fabricated on a standardized metal die by using a two-stage putty impression and poured with die stone. They were divided into three groups of 15 each: A, B, and C. For group?A, Ni-Cr copings were fabricated by conventional casting procedures;?for group B, Co-Cr copings by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS); and for group?C, zirconium copings by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems. Four areas around the tooth surface, namely, the mid-mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual surfaces, were digitally analyzed for marginal adaptation under the scanning electron microscope. Results The mean marginal gap for group A on the mid mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual surfaces was 79.67, 83.27, 90.67, and 89.13 μm, respectively. The mean marginal gap for group B on the mid-mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual surfaces was 38.13, 46.20, 45.73, and 42.20 μm, respectively. The mean marginal gap for group C on the mid mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual surfaces was 36.73, 31.73, 29.00, and 30.53 μm, respectively. Conclusion The marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM Zr copings is more accurate when compared to the DMLS Co-Cr?and Cast Ni-Cr copings on a standard master die.
机译:背景和目的边缘适应对于牙科修复化的长期寿命和临床成功至关重要。不正确的边缘适应可能导致口服流体,导致微渗透和水泥溶解。目前的体外研究旨在评估用不同制造程序生产的镍铬(Ni-Cr)应对,钴 - 铬(CO-CR)应对和锆(Zr)应对的边缘适应。通过使用两级腻子印象并用模石倒入标准化的金属模具上,在标准化的金属模具上制造了总共45个应对。它们分为3组15组:A,B和C.对于组,通过常规铸造程序制造了Ni-Cr应对;α,B组,通过直接金属激光烧结(DML)进行CO-CR调封(DML) ;对于组,通过计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD / CAM)系统,锆COP。牙齿表面周围的四个区域,即中间介质,颊,远端和舌表面,用于在扫描电子显微镜下进行边缘自适应进行数字化。结果分别为79.67,83.27,90.67和89.13μm的Mid Mesial,Peaccal,远端和舌表面的平均边缘间隙。中间间隙,颊,远端和舌叶上B组的平均边缘间隙分别为38.13,46.20,45.73和42.20μm。 Mesial,Buccal,远端和舌叶上C组的平均边缘间隙分别为36.73,31.73,29.00和30.53μm。结论与DMLS CO-CR相比,CAD / CAM ZR调位的边缘适应更准确吗?标准主模具上的铸造Ni-Cr Copings。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号