首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique
【24h】

‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique

机译:“我们都有同样的有权有健康服务的权利”:莫桑比克纳马提法律赋权计划的案例研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Legal empowerment and social accountability are two strategies that are increasingly used to address gaps in healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, including failure to provide services that should be available and poor clinical and interpersonal quality of care. This paper is an explanatory case study of a legal empowerment effort that employs community paralegals and trains Village Health Committees (VHCs) in Mozambique. The research objective was to explore how community paralegals solved cases, the impact paralegals had on health services, and how their work affected the relationship between the community and the health sector at the local level. The case study had two components: (1) a retrospective review of 24 cases of patient/community grievances about the health system, and (2) qualitative investigation of the program and program context. The case reviews were accomplished by conducting structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with those directly involved in the case. The qualitative investigation entailed semi-structured Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with district, provincial, and national health managers and Namati staff. In addition, focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with Health Advocates and VHC members. Case resolution conferred a sense of empowerment to clients, brought immediate, concrete improvements in health service quality at the health facilities concerned, and seemingly instigated a virtuous circle of rights-claiming. The program also engendered incipient improvements in relations between clients and the health system. We identified three key mechanisms underlying case resolution, including: bolstered administrative capacity within the health sector, reduced transaction and political costs for health providers, and provider fear of administrative sanction. This study contributes to the limited literature regarding the mechanisms of legal empowerment case resolution in health systems and the impact of hybrid legal empowerment and social accountability approaches. Future research might assess the sustainability of case resolution; how governance at central, provincial, and district level is affected by similar programs; and to what extent the mix of different cases addressed by legal empowerment influences the success of the program.
机译:法律赋权和社会问责制是两项策略,越来越多地用于解决低收入和中等收入国家的医疗保健中的差距,包括未能提供应提供的服务,临床和人际关系的临床护理。本文是对莫桑比克雇用社区律师委员会的法律赋权努力的解释性案例研究,莫桑比克居住村卫生委员会(VHCS)。研究目标是探讨社区律师助理如何解决案件,影响律师助理对卫生服务,以及他们的工作如何影响社区与卫生部门在地方一级之间的关系。案例研究有两个组成部分:(1)对卫生系统的24例患者/社区申诉的回顾性审查,(2)计划和计划背景的定性调查。案例审查是通过与直接参与案件的人进行结构化的深入访谈(IDIS)来完成。定性调查需要半结构化的主要线人访谈(KIIS),省,省,国家卫生经理和Namati员工。此外,焦点小组讨论(FGDs)举行了健康倡导者和副主席。案例决议赋予客户的赋权感,带来了立即,在有关卫生设施的卫生服务质量的立即,具体的改善,看似煽动了良好的权利循环。该计划还提出了对客户与卫生系统关系的初期改进。我们确定了三个案例决议的关键机制,包括:卫生部门内的加强行政能力,减少卫生提供者的交易和政治成本,以及提供行政批准的提供商担心。本研究有助于有关卫生系统法律赋权案件决议的机制的有限文献,以及混合法律赋权和社会责任方法的影响。未来的研究可能会评估案件决议的可持续性;中央,省级和地区一级的治理如何受类似计划的影响;并在多大程度上通过法律赋权解决的不同病例的组合影响了该计划的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号