...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Employing a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to evaluate the impact of brief risk and protective factor prevention interventions for American Indian Youth Suicide
【24h】

Employing a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to evaluate the impact of brief risk and protective factor prevention interventions for American Indian Youth Suicide

机译:采用顺序多分配随机试验(SMART),评估法式风险和保护因子预防干预措施对美国印度青年自杀的影响

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundAmerican Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) suicide inequities are concentrated in youth, with the highest rates among 10 to 24?year olds [1]. Recent data indicate that AI/AN youth and young adults (10–24) have suicide mortality rates (crude rate 27.09 per 100,000) that are more than 2 to 3 times higher same-aged European American (crude rate 12.60 per 100,000), African American (crude rate 7.97 per 100,000), and Asian/Pacific Islander (crude rate 8.68 per 100,000) peers [2]. These rates are likely underestimates due to jurisdictional challenges for who is responsible for reporting deaths when tribal lands intersect with county and state, racial and ethnic misclassification [1], and tribal communities’ distrust of researchers and data collection processes resulting in a lack of reporting. The large loss of youth to suicide is devastating to AI/AN communities and obstructs Indigenous values and visions of youth as sacred and future leaders [3].Compounded by a federal system of severely underfunded mental health care [4], suicide risks among AI/ANs include but are not limited to: mental health problems, chronic pain [5,6,7], historical trauma [8,9,10], adverse childhood experiences [11]—including domestic violence or history of abuse, alcohol or drug misuse [10, 12, 13], and the suicide attempt or death of family or friends [7, 13]. Protection from suicide for AI/AN communities has been linked to cultural factors, including tribal spirituality, participation in cultural activities, social support from tribal leaders, and holistic connectedness to self/family/community/land [14,15,16,17,18]. Suicide rates also vary greatly based on geographic region and tribal community [19]. While some tribes experience little suicide loss, many impacted AI/AN communities are mobilizing to end this disparity through community-driven innovations and evaluations.The White Mountain Apache Tribe (WMAT) and Johns Hopkins Center for American Indian Health (JH CAIH) have been research partners addressing suicide prevention since 1994. Self-determination underscores WMAT suicide prevention efforts: In 2002, WMAT passed a tribal resolution mandating the reporting of all suicidal behaviors for all departments within the tribe’s jurisdiction. This resolution includes mandated reporting of suicide ideation, attempts, and deaths, as well as non-suicidal self-injury (added in 2008), and binge substance use (added in 2010) to the Celebrating Life suicide prevention program. This program is led by a group of White Mountain Apache community mental health specialists (CMHSs) using a common registry system (see Cwik et al., 2014 [20]). This community-wide suicide surveillance and case management follow-up system has become a nationally-recognized model with endorsements from the Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Indian Health Service, and?The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [20]. Two noteworthy features of the WMAT suicide prevention system are: a) a focus on community-driven solutions that are adjunct to conventional mental health treatment; and b) the employment of community-based paraprofessionals to fill gaps in services, and improve the cultural congruence and continuity of care [21, 22].Between 2001 and 2006, data collected through the tribal surveillance system documented WMAT suicide rates at 40.0 per 100,000, nearly 11 times the U.S. All Races rate [23]. The highest suicide rates were among 15 to 24?year olds at 128.5 per 100,000, which was 13 times the U.S. All Races rate and 7 times the All AI/AN rate. Since 2008, the WMAT-JH CAIH research team has completed a series of risk and protective factor studies utilizing qualitative and quantitative approaches that uncovered the critical role of substance use, specifically binge substance use, as a co-occurring risk factor for suicide attempts and deaths. In addition, impulsivity and challenges with family support were dominant risk factors for suicide attempts and related substance use [24]. Research also illustrated positive cultural identity and connectedness to family and community as strong potential protective factors [24, 25].Based on these findings, the WMAT-JH CAIH research partners have followed a tribal participatory research process to adapt, develop and pilot-test several evidence-based and culturally-informed interventions that form a comprehensive public health approach to suicide prevention [26]. In addition to surveillance and case management, key components of this public health approach include: 1) a culturally adapted brief intervention called “New Hope” focused on safety-planning and suicide risk reduction delivered to youth and a family member by a WMAT CMHS following a suicide attempt [21], and, 2) a culturally grounded, upstream suicide prevention program called “The Elders’ Resilience Curriculum,” (implemented in 2012) in which Elders teach cultural knowledge and values observed as protective against suicide. Between 2007 and
机译:Backgroundican印度/阿拉斯加本土(AI / AN)自杀性不公平体集中在青少年,最高率为10到24?岁月[1]。最近的数据表明,AI /青少年和年轻人(10-24)的自杀死亡率(原油率为27.09每1010人),同比欧洲美洲(每10万吨12.60),非洲的2至3倍美国人(每10万人7.97瑞价7.97),亚洲/太平洋岛民(每10万吨8.68)同龄人[2]。由于在部落土地与县域和国家与县域,种族和民族错误分类[1]之间的司法挑战相交,以及部落社区对研究人员和数据收集过程的不信任导致缺乏报告的情况下,这些利率可能低估了。对自杀的大量损失是毁灭性的是AI /社区,并阻碍青少年的土着价值观和愿景作为神圣和未来的领导者[3]。由一个严重资金的心理健康保健的联邦制度组成,自杀风险/ ANS包括但不限于:心理健康问题,慢性疼痛[5,6,7],历史创伤[8,9,10],不利的童年经历[11] - 包括家庭暴力或虐待,酒精或历史药物滥用[10,12,13],以及家庭或朋友的自杀企图或死亡[7,13]。免受自杀于艾/社区的自杀与文化因素有关,包括部落灵性,参与文化活动,部落领导者的社会支持,以及对自主/家庭/社区/土地的整体连通性[14,15,16,17, 18]。自杀率也基于地理区域和部落社区的差异很大[19]。虽然一些部落的部落经历了很少的自杀损失,但许多影响的AI /社区正在动员通过社区驱动的创新和评估来结束这种差异。白山阿帕克部落(WMAT)和美国印度健康(JH CAIH)的约翰霍普金斯中心研究合作伙伴自1994年以来寻求自杀预防。自决强调WMAT自杀预防努力:2002年,WMAT通过了部落决议,该决议授权部落管辖范围内所有部门的所有自杀行为。该决议包括授权报告自杀意识形来,尝试和死亡以及非自杀性自我损伤(在2008年添加),以及狂欢物质使用(2010年加入)庆祝生命自杀预防计划。该计划由一组白山Apache社区心理健康专家(CMHSS)引导,使用普通的注册系统(参见Cwik等,2014 [20])。这种社区范围内的自杀监测和案例管理随访系统已成为一个国家认可的模型,具有来自儿童和青少年精神病学院,印度卫生服务的认可,以及滥用药物和心理健康服务管理局[20]。 WMAT自杀预防系统的两个值得注意的特征是:a)专注于对传统心理健康治疗的辅助的社区驱动的解决方案; b)基于社区的PARAPROFERIGALS在服务中填补差距,并提高护理的文化同时和连续性[21,22] .21,22] .2001和2006,通过部落监测系统收集的数据记录了40.0的WMAT自杀率100,000,美国所有种族率的近11倍[23]。最高自杀率是15至24人的历史,每10万人128.5,这是美国的13倍。所有种族的比赛率和所有AI /率的7倍。自2008年以来,WMAT-JH CAIH研究团队已经完成了一系列风险和保护因子研究,利用了揭示了物质使用,特别是狂犬病药物的关键作用,作为自杀企图的共同发生的危险因素的定性和定量方法死亡人数。此外,对家族支持的冲动和挑战是自杀企图和相关物质使用的主要危险因素[24]。研究还将积极的文化身份和社区相关的阳性文化认同和关联,因为对这些调查结果进行了强大的潜在保护因素,WMAT-JH CAIH研究合作伙伴遵循了部落的参与式研究程序,以适应,开发和试验试验基于若干证据和文化上通知的干预措施,形成了自杀预防的全面公共卫生方法[26]。除了监督和案例管理外,这种公共卫生方法的关键组成部分包括:1)一个文化适应的简短干预,称为“新希望”,其专注于通过WMAT CMHS向青年和家庭成员提供的安全规划和自杀风险减少自杀未遂[21] ,,2)一个文化地面,上游自杀预防计划,称为“长老责备课程”(2012年实施),其中长老教授文化知识和价值观视为保护措施。在2007年之间

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号