首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Combined nicotine patch with gum versus nicotine patch alone in smoking cessation in Hong Kong primary care clinics: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Combined nicotine patch with gum versus nicotine patch alone in smoking cessation in Hong Kong primary care clinics: a randomised controlled trial

机译:组合尼古丁贴片与口香糖对尼古丁补丁单独在香港初级保健诊所的吸烟:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:The prevalence of daily cigarette smoking has dropped to 10% in Hong Kong (HK) in 2017, however, smoking still kills 5700 persons per year. Studies suggest that abstinence rates are higher with combined NRT than single NRT, although local data on safety and benefits of combined NRT are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of combined NRT with single NRT among HK Chinese.METHODS:This is a one-year, two-arm, parallel randomised trial. Five hundred sixty smokers, who smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day for ≥1?year, were randomized to combined and single NRT. Combined NRT group received counseling and nicotine patch & gum. Single NRT group received counselling and nicotine patch. Primary outcome was abstinence rate measured as self-reported 7-day point prevalence with CO validated at 52?weeks. Secondary outcomes included smoking abstinence rates at 4, 12, & 26?weeks. Crude odds ratio and p-value were reported from logistic regression without adjustment; for trend analysis, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and p-value were reported from Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) (controlling for time). All AORs were adjusted for age, sex, baseline CO and clusters.RESULTS:Abstinence rates at 4, 12, 26 and 52?weeks were all higher in the combined NRT group (35.8, 21.9, 16.8, 20.1%) compared with the single NRT group (28, 16.8, 11.2, 14.3%). At 4?weeks, combined NRT group was more likely to quit smoking (OR 1.43, 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.05) than the single NRT group. From GEE analysis, combined NRT group had a significantly higher abstinence rate (23.6%) than the single NRT group (17.6%) across repeated measures at all-time points. Combined NRT group was more likely to quit smoking (OR 1.43, 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.77). No significant difference in the side effect profile was detected between groups.CONCLUSIONS:Smokers given 8?weeks of combined NRT were more likely to quit smoking at 4, 12, 26 and 52?weeks compared with single NRT. Combined NRT was as well tolerated as single NRT and it should be further promoted in our community.TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT03836560 from ClinicalTrial.gov , 9 Feb 2019.
机译:背景:2017年,香港(香港)的日报吸烟率下降至10%,然而,每年吸烟仍然杀死5700人。研究表明,禁欲率比单一NRT合并,尽管缺乏关于NRT的安全和益处的本地数据。本研究的目的是比较NRT与单一NRT之间的效果。方法:这是一年,双臂,并行随机试验。五百六十名吸烟者,他吸烟≥10支香烟/日≥1年,是随机组合和单一的NRT。结合NRT组接受咨询和尼古丁补丁和胶。单一NRT集团接受咨询和尼古丁补丁。主要结果是禁欲率,以自我报告的7天患病率与52个星期验证。次要成果包括吸烟戒烟率4,12和26岁?周。没有调整的Logistic回归报告了粗赔率比和p值;对于趋势分析,从广义估计方程(GEE)报告了调整后的差距(AOR)和P值(控制时间)。所有AORS都被调整为年龄,性别,基线CO和群集。结果:4,12,26和52的禁欲率在NRT组联合组(35.8,21.9,16.8,20.1%)中全部较高NRT组(28,16.8,11.2,14.3%)。在4个?周,联合NRT组比单一NRT组更容易戒烟(或1.43,95%CI,1.00至2.05)。从GEE分析,联合NRT组的禁欲率明显较高(23.6%),而不是在all-time积分的重复措施中的单一NRT组(17.6%)。结合NRT组更有可能戒烟(或1.43,95%CI,1.15至1.77)。在组之间检测到副作用轮廓的显着差异。结论:给出的吸烟者8?几周的NRT更有可能在4,12,26和52次吸烟,与单一NRT相比。结合的NRT与单一的NRT一样耐受,它应该在我们的社区中进一步促进.Tirial注册:来自Clinicaltrial.gov,2019年2月9日的NCT03836560。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号