首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Cost-effectiveness of Family Group Conferencing in child welfare: a controlled study
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of Family Group Conferencing in child welfare: a controlled study

机译:儿童福利家庭集团会议的成本效益:受控研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aimed to examine the short- and long term (cost-) effectiveness of Family Group Conferencing (FGC) compared to care as usual (CAU) in terms of improved child safety, empowerment and social support. A subgroup of a larger randomized controlled trial, comprising 69 families in child welfare (experimental group: n?=?46; control group: n?=?23), was included. No additional effects of FGC on child safety, social support and only short-term positive effects on empowerment were found. There were no differences in costs between FGC and CAU. The chance for FGC to be cost-effective was small. For families who refused FGC, the FGC approach was more cost-effective than CAU, whereas it was less cost-effective for families that prepared or completed FGC. Overall, FGC is not (cost-)effective in improving child safety, empowerment and social support, but cost-effectiveness varies at different levels of FGC-completion. Dutch Trial Register number NTR4320 . Registered 17 December 2013.
机译:该研究旨在审查家庭集团会议(FGC)的短期和长期(成本)有效性,与常规(CAU)相比,在提高儿童安全,赋权和社会支持方面。包括一个较大的随机对照试验的亚组,包括儿童福利69个家庭(实验组:N?= 46;对照组:N?=?23)。 FGC对儿童安全,社会支持和对赋权的短期积极影响没有额外的影响。 FGC和CAU之间的成本没有差异。 FGC的机会是成本效益的小。对于拒绝FGC的家庭来说,FGC方法比CAU更具成本效益,而这对于准备或完成FGC的家庭来说较低。总体而言,FGC没有(成本 - )有效改善儿童安全,赋权和社会支持,但成本效益在FGC完毕的不同水平上变化。荷兰语试验登记号码NTR4320。注册2013年12月17日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号