首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:诱导化疗的疗效和安全性与同时化学疗法相结合,同时在鼻咽癌患者中单独进行化学疗法:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial.METHODS:PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials.RESULTS:From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC?+?CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.89, p?=?0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94, p?=?0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, p??0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, p??0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.74, p??0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87, p?=?0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p?=?0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.86, p?=?0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC?+?CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade?≥?3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT.CONCLUSION:IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future.
机译:背景:诱导化疗(IC)联合同期化学疗法(CCRT)作为型鼻咽癌(NPC)的一线治疗。由于IC和CCRT中使用的不同化学治疗药物,结果仍然存在争议。方法:系统地检索持续持续符合2019年9月11日的潜在符合条件的临床试验。符合条件的研究的竞争性,COMPASE,科学网站和Cochrane图书馆数据库。已登记和预期随机对照临床试验。结果:从526条记录,九篇包括七项随机对照临床试验的含有符合条件的9项,共有2311名型号晚期NPC患者。 IC?+?CCRT显着降低了死亡风险(3年危害比[HR]:0.70,95%置信区间[CI] 0.55-0.89,P?= 0.003; 5年HR:0.77,95%CI 0.62-0.94,p?= 0.01),疾病进展(3年HR:0.67,95%CI 0.55-0.80,P?<0.001; 5年HR:0.70,95%CI 0.58-0.83,P? <?0.0001),远处转移(3年HR:0.58,95%CI 0.45-0.74,P?<0.0001; 5年HR:0.69,95%CI 0.55-0.87,P?= 0.001)和局部间复发(3年HR:0.69,95%CI 0.50-0.95,P?= 0.02; 5年HR:0.66,95%CI 0.51-0.86,P?= 0.002)比CCRT。与CCRT,IC相比,IC?CCRT表现出较高的3级或更多的中性粒细胞减少症,血小板减少症,恶心,呕吐和肝毒性,并且在CCRT期间等级α≥β3血小板减少和呕吐的更高相对风险。结论:IC结合CCRT显着提高了型招生晚期NPC患者的存活。此外,IC和CCRT期间毒性良好耐受。需要进一步的临床试验,以确认未来最佳感应化学治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号