首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Standard (8?weeks) vs long (12?weeks) timing to minimally-invasive surgery after NeoAdjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled parallel group trial (TiMiSNAR)
【24h】

Standard (8?weeks) vs long (12?weeks) timing to minimally-invasive surgery after NeoAdjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled parallel group trial (TiMiSNAR)

机译:标准(8?周)与直肠癌新辅助化学疗法后微创手术的标准(12?周)对直肠癌的微创手术:多中心随机控制并行组试验(Timisnar)

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:The optimal timing of surgery in relation to chemoradiation is still controversial. Retrospective analysis has demonstrated in the recent decades that the regression of adenocarcinoma can be slow and not complete until after several months. More recently, increasing pathologic Complete Response rates have been demonstrated to be correlated with longer time interval. The purpose of the trial is to demonstrate if delayed timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy actually affects pathologic Complete Response and reflects on disease-free survival and overall survival rather than standard timing.METHODS:The trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial comparing standard and delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Three-hundred and forty patients will be randomized on an equal basis to either robotic-assisted/standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery after 8?weeks or robotic-assisted/standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery after 12?weeks.DISCUSSION:To date, it is well-know that pathologic Complete Response is associated with excellent prognosis and an overall survival of 90%. In the Lyon trial the rate of pCR or near pathologic Complete Response increased from 10.3 to 26% and in retrospective studies the increase rate was about 23-30%. These results may be explained on the relationship between radiation therapy and tumor regression: DNA damage occurs during irradiation, but cellular lysis occurs within the next weeks. Study results, whether confirmed that performing surgery after 12?weeks from neoadjuvant treatment is advantageous from a technical and oncological point of view, may change the current pathway of the treatment in those patient suffering from rectal cancer.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT3465982.
机译:背景:与校容相关的手术的最佳时间仍然是争议的。回顾性分析在近几十年中已经证明,腺癌的回归可能会缓慢而不完整,直到几个月后。最近,已经证明了增加病理完整响应率与较长时间间隔相关。审判的目的是证明在新辅助化学疗法后手术的延迟时序实际上影响病理完全反应,并反映无病生存和整体存活而不是标准时刻。方法:试验是一种多中心,前瞻性,随机控制,未粘连,并联群试验比较新辅助化学疗法后标准和延迟手术治疗直肠癌治疗治疗。三百和四十名患者将在8岁或1周或机器人辅助/标准腹腔镜直肠癌手术后的机器人辅助/标准腹腔镜直肠癌手术随机分配到12岁以下的腹腔镜直肠癌手术。迄今为止,它是众所周知,病理完全反应与优异的预后和90%的总体存活相关。在里昂试验中,PCR率或近乎病理完全反应的速度从10.3增加到26%,回顾性研究增加了约23-30%。这些结果可以在放射治疗和肿瘤回归之间的关系解释:在照射期间发生DNA损伤,但细胞裂解在未来几周内发生。研究结果,无论是在新辅助治疗后12个月后表现手术是否有利,从技术和肿瘤的角度来看,可能会改变患有直肠癌患者的治疗的当前途径.Trial注册:ClinColicalTrials.gov NCT3465982。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号