...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Efficacy and safety of HER2 inhibitors in combination with or without pertuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of HER2 inhibitors in combination with or without pertuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:HER2抑制剂组合或没有Pertuzumab用于HER2阳性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Although the dual anti-HER2 therapy, namely, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel, has shown promising results in HER2+ breast cancer patients, whether the dose, efficacy and safety of this treatment differs from those of other pertuzumab-based dual anti-HER2 therapies remain controversial. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of H (trastuzumab or trastuzumab emtansine ± chemotherapy)?+?P (pertuzumab) compared with those of H in HER2+ breast cancer patients.METHODS:A comprehensive search was performed to identify eligible studies comparing the efficacy and safety of H?+?P versus H. The pathologic complete response (pCR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcomes, and safety was the secondary outcome. A subgroup analysis of pCR according to hormone receptor (HR) status was performed. All analyses were conducted using STATA 11.0.RESULTS:Twenty-six studies (9872 patients) were identified. In the neoadjuvant setting, H?+?P significantly improved the pCR [odds ratio (OR)?=?1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.63; p?=?0.006]. In the metastatic setting, H?+?P significantly improved PFS [hazard ratios (HRs)?=?0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; p??0.001]. There was a trend towards better OS but that it did not reach statistical significance (HRs?=?0.81; 95% CI, 0.64-1.03; p?=?0.082). A subgroup analysis revealed that the HER2+/HR- patients who received H?+?P showed the highest increase in the pCR. Rash, diarrhea, epistaxis, mucosal inflammation, and anemia were significantly more frequently observed with H?+?P than with H, whereas myalgia was less frequent (OR?=?0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.01; p?=?0.072), and no significant difference in cardiac toxicity was observed between these therapies (OR?=?1.26; 95% CI, 0.81-1.95; P?=?0.309).CONCLUSIONS:Our study confirms that H?+?P is superior to H in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of HER2+ breast cancer, and increase the risk of acceptable and tolerable toxicity (rash, diarrhea, epistaxis, mucosal inflammation, and anemia).TRIAL REGISTRATION:A systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (identification number: CRD42018110415 ).
机译:背景:虽然双重抗Her2疗法,即Pertuzumab Plus Trastuzumab和Docetaxel,但在HER2 +乳腺癌患者中表现出有前途的结果,这种治疗的剂量,功效和安全性是否与其他基于Pertuzumab的双重抗HER2的剂量不同疗法仍然存在争议。这种系统评价评估H(曲妥珠单抗或曲妥珠单抗+化疗)的疗效和安全性,与HER2 +乳腺癌患者中的H相比,+βp(Pertuzumab)。方法:进行全面搜索以确定比较疗效的合格研究H?+ + P与H.病理完全反应(PCR),中位进展生存(PFS)和总存活(OS)是主要结果,安全性是次要结果。根据激素受体(HR)状态进行PCR的亚组分析。使用Stata 11.0进行所有分析。结果:确定了26项研究(9872名患者)。在Neoadjuvant设置中,h?+Δp显着改善了PCR [赔率比(或)?= 1.33; 95%置信区间(CI),1.08-1.63; p?= 0.006]。在转移性设置中,H?+ΔP显着改善PFS [危险比(HRS)吗?= 0.75; 95%CI,0.68-0.84; p?<?0.001]。有一种更好的操作系统的趋势,但它没有达到统计学意义(HRS?= 0.81; 95%CI,0.64-1.03; P?= 0.082)。亚组分析显示,接受H的HER2 + / HR-患者患者显示PCR的最高增加。用h + + p比Hα+βprash,腹泻,epistaxis,粘膜炎症和贫血症明显更频繁地观察到,而肌痛越频繁(或?= 0.91; 95%ci,0.82-1.01; p?=? 0.072),在这些疗法之间观察到心脏毒性的显着差异(或?=?1.26; 95%CI,0.81-1.95; P?=?0.309)。结论:我们的研究证实H?+?P是优越的在HER2 +乳腺癌的(NEO)佐剂治疗中,增加了可接受和可耐受毒性的风险(皮疹,腹泻,外交,粘膜炎症和贫血).Trial注册:在Prospero注册系统审查议定书(识别数字:CRD42018110415)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号