首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science >Shear Bond Strength of Aged CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials Repaired by Resin Composite In vitro Using Different Repair Adhesives
【24h】

Shear Bond Strength of Aged CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials Repaired by Resin Composite In vitro Using Different Repair Adhesives

机译:使用不同修复粘合剂的树脂复合材料修复老年CAD /凸轮陶瓷材料的剪切粘结强度

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three different CAD/CAM ceramic blocks repaired with Nano-hybrid composite resin using three different repair adhesives, and to Compare and determine which bonding systems achieve superior bond strength with each type of ceramic materials tested. Materials and methods: A total of 72 specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm) of ceramic mini-blocks will be prepared and divided into three groups (n=24) according to the type of ceramic materials as: Group A: A resin Nano ceramic (VITA Enamic EM-14 2m2HT). Group B: A feldspar ceramic (Cerec block CPC-14 A2C; Sirona Dental, Germany). Group C: A lithium disilicate reinforced ceramic (IPS e.max HTA2 CAD; IVOCLAR), then each type was subjected to surface roughness using silicon carbide paper with a grit size of 120 p. Thermo-cycled (500 cycles, 5 °C to 55 °C). Each group was divided into three subgroups treated with three types of repair adhesives as: (1) Ceramic repair kit by Ivoclar vivadent. (2) Scotch bond universal adhesive by 3M ESPE (3) Application of tokuyama universal self-cure bond. All blocks will be repaired using the Nano-hybrid resin composite (Tetric Evo Ceram/A2). The ceramic-composite blocks will then subject to shear bond strength testing machine and the failure mode will be determine with stereomicroscopes. The data were analyzed using Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test (multiple Pairwise comparisons). Results: The result of this study revealed that for the vita Enamic groups, Ivoclar repair system showed higher bond strength values with a significant difference with Palfique universal bond. In Cerec CPC and IPS e.max CAD, Palfique universal bond showed the highest mean bond strength values than the other repair adhesives. Conclusion: Palfique universal bond achieved a high bond strength values with each type of ceramic material tested in this study. Type of ceramic materials produces the greatest influence on the bonding strength with a specific type of repair adhesive. Ivoclar ceramic repair system kit worked better with Vita Enamic ceramic. Scotch bond universal adhesive produced best results with IPS e.max CAD. Palfique universal bond bonds with the three types of ceramics equally.
机译:该研究的目的:本研究的目的是评估使用三种不同的修复粘合剂修复的三种不同CAD /凸轮陶瓷块的剪切粘合强度,并使用三种不同的修复粘合剂进行比较,并确定哪种粘合系统实现优异的粘合强度用每种类型的陶瓷材料测试。材料和方法:将制备总共72个试样(10×10×2mm)的陶瓷迷你块,并根据陶瓷材料的类型(n = 24)分为:A组:树脂纳米陶瓷(Vita enamic em-14 2m2ht)。 B组:长石陶瓷(CEREC块CPC-14 A2C; SI​​RONA牙科,德国)。 C组:锂末端增强陶瓷(IPS E.max HTA2 CAD; IVoclar),然后使用碳化硅纸具有120 p的碳化硅纸进行表面粗糙度。热循环(500个循环,5℃至55℃)。将每组分为三种亚组,用三种类型的修复粘合剂处理,如:(1)由IVoClar Vievadent的陶瓷修复试剂盒。 (2)苏格兰债券通用粘合剂3M ESPE(3)在港山普通自我固化键的应用。所有块将使用纳米杂交树脂复合材料(Tetric Evo Ceram / A2)进行修复。然后,陶瓷复合块将受剪切粘合强度试验机,并且失效模式将用立体镜检查确定。使用双向ANOVA和BONFERRONI后HOC测试(多个成对比较)分析数据。结果:本研究结果表明,对于VITA稀有组,IVOCLAR修复系统显示出更高的粘合强度值,与Palfique Universal Bond有显着差异。在CEREC CPC和IPS E.MAX CAD中,Palfique Universal Bond显示出比其他修复粘合剂的平均粘合强度值最高。结论:Palfique Universal Bond通过本研究中测试的每种类型的陶瓷材料实现了高粘合强度值。陶瓷材料的类型为具有特定类型的修复粘合剂的粘合强度产生最大的影响。 ivoclar陶瓷修复系统套件与Vita纯陶瓷更好地工作。苏格兰债券通用粘合剂通过IPS E.Max CAD产生最佳效果。 Palfique Universal Lod键与三种类型的陶瓷同样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号