首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Understanding Patient Anxieties in the Social Media Era: Qualitative Analysis and Natural Language Processing of an Online Male Infertility Community
【24h】

Understanding Patient Anxieties in the Social Media Era: Qualitative Analysis and Natural Language Processing of an Online Male Infertility Community

机译:了解社交媒体时代的患者焦虑:在线男性不孕群落的定性分析和自然语言处理

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Couples struggling with infertility are increasingly turning to the internet for infertility-related content and to connect with others. Most of the published data on infertility and the internet only address the experiences of women, with limited studies focusing exclusively on internet discussions on male factor infertility. Objective The aim of this study was to understand the concerns and experiences of discussants on an online male infertility community and to provide insight into their perceptions of interactions with health care professionals. Methods Using the large-scale data analytics tool BigQuery, we extracted all posts in the r/MaleInfertility community (877 members) of the social media website and discussion board Reddit from November 2017 to October 2018. We performed a qualitative thematic analysis and quantitative semantic analysis using Language Inquiry and Word Count 2015 of the extracted posts to identify dominant themes and subthemes of discussions. Descriptive statistics and semantic analytic Z-scores were computed. Results From the analysis of 97 posts, notable themes and subthemes emerged: 70 (72%) posts shared personal experiences, including feeling emasculated or isolated or describing a negative (28/97, 29%), positive (13/97, 13%), or neutral (56/97, 58%) experience with a health care professional; 19% (18/97) of the posts posed questions about personal semen analysis results. On the basis of semantic analysis, posts by men had higher authenticity scores (Z=3.44; P &.001), suggesting more honest or personal texts, but lower clout scores (Z=4.57; P &.001), suggesting a more tentative or anxious style of writing, compared with posts by women. Conclusions To our knowledge, this study represents the first evaluation of a social media community focused exclusively on male infertility using mixed methodology. These results suggest a role for physicians on social media to engage with patients and connect them to accurate resources, in addition to opportunities to improve in-office patient education.
机译:背景夫妇与不孕不孕的夫妇越来越多地转向互联网以获得与不孕症相关的内容并与他人连接。大多数出版的不孕症数据和互联网只解决了妇女的经验,有限的研究专注于对男性因子不孕的互联网讨论。目的这项研究的目的是了解在线男性不孕群落上讨论者的关切和经验,并提供洞察他们对与医疗保健专业人士的互动的看法。方法使用大规模数据分析工具BigQuery,我们从2017年11月到2018年11月的社交媒体网站和讨论委员会Reddit的R / Malaryfultiventy社区(877名成员)中提出了所有帖子。我们执行了一个定性专题分析和量化语义使用提取的帖子的语言查询和字数2015分析,以确定主导主题和讨论的子项。计算描述性统计和语义分析Z分数。结果来自97个职位,值得注意的主题和次节:70(72%)员额分享个人经验,包括感觉阉割或孤立或描述消极(28/97,29%),阳性(13/97,13% )或中立(56/97,58%)医疗保健专业人士的经验; 19%(18/97)的帖子对个人精液分析结果提出了问题。在语义分析的基础上,男性的帖子具有更高的真实性分数(Z = 3.44; P& .001),暗示更诚实或个人文本,但较低的Clout分数(z = 4.57; p& .001),建议与女性的帖子相比,写作更初步或焦虑的写作风格。本研究表明,本研究代表了使用混合方法专注于男性不孕症的社交媒体界的第一次评估。这些结果表明,除了改善办公室患者教育的机会之外,医生对社交媒体对社交媒体的作用,并将其连接到准确的资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号