首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study
【24h】

Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study

机译:评估智能助理反应,以了解人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的准确性和错误信息:内容分析研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Almost half (46%) of Americans have used a smart assistant of some kind (eg, Apple Siri), and 25% have used a stand-alone smart assistant (eg, Amazon Echo). This positions smart assistants as potentially useful modalities for retrieving health-related information; however, the accuracy of smart assistant responses lacks rigorous evaluation. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the levels of accuracy, misinformation, and sentiment in smart assistant responses to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination–related questions. Methods We systematically examined responses to questions about the HPV vaccine from the following four most popular smart assistants: Apple Siri, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Microsoft Cortana. One team member posed 10 questions to each smart assistant and recorded all queries and responses. Two raters independently coded all responses (κ=0.85). We then assessed differences among the smart assistants in terms of response accuracy, presence of misinformation, and sentiment regarding the HPV vaccine. Results A total of 103 responses were obtained from the 10 questions posed across the smart assistants. Google Assistant data were excluded owing to nonresponse. Over half (n=63, 61%) of the responses of the remaining three smart assistants were accurate. We found statistically significant differences across the smart assistants (N=103, χ ~(2) _(2)=7.807, P =.02), with Cortana yielding the greatest proportion of misinformation. Siri yielded the greatest proportion of accurate responses (n=26, 72%), whereas Cortana yielded the lowest proportion of accurate responses (n=33, 54%). Most response sentiments across smart assistants were positive (n=65, 64%) or neutral (n=18, 18%), but Cortana’s responses yielded the largest proportion of negative sentiment (n=7, 12%). Conclusions Smart assistants appear to be average-quality sources for HPV vaccination information, with Alexa responding most reliably. Cortana returned the largest proportion of inaccurate responses, the most misinformation, and the greatest proportion of results with negative sentiments. More collaboration between technology companies and public health entities is necessary to improve the retrieval of accurate health information via smart assistants.
机译:背景技术近一半(46%)的美国人使用了某种智能助手(例如,Apple Siri),25%使用了独立的智能助手(例如,亚马逊回声)。这位智能助手是检索与健康相关信息的潜在有用的方式;然而,智能助理反应的准确性缺乏严格的评估。目的本研究旨在评估智能助理反应对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种相关问题的准确性,错误信息和情绪的水平。方法从以下四个最受欢迎的智能助理系统地检查了对关于HPV疫苗问题的问题:Apple Siri,Google Assistant,Amazon Alexa和Microsoft Cortana的答案。一个团队成员向每个智能助手提出了10个问题,并记录了所有查询和响应。两位评估者独立编码所有反应(κ= 0.85)。然后,我们在响应准确性,存在错误的存在和关于HPV疫苗的情绪方面评估了智能助理之间的差异。结果总共103个响应,从智能助理所带来的10个问题中获得。由于非响应,谷歌助理数据被排除在外。剩下的三个智能助手的答案超过一半(n = 63,61%)是准确的。我们发现智能助理的统计学意义(n = 103,χ〜(2)_(2)= 7.807,p = .02),Cortana产生了最大的错误信息比例。 SIRI产生了最大的准确反应(n = 26,72%),而Coltaana产生最低比例的准确反应(n = 33,54%)。智能助理的大多数响应情绪是阳性的(n = 65,64%)或中性(n = 18,18%),但Cortana的反应产生了最大的负面情绪比例(n = 7,12%)。结论智能助理似乎是HPV疫苗接种信息的平均质量来源,Alexa最可靠地响应。 Cortana返回了最大的不准确反应,最误解的比例,以及负面情绪的最大比例。技术公司与公共卫生实体之间的更多合作是通过智能助理改善准确健康信息的检索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号