首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Real-world Effectiveness of Liraglutide vs. Sitagliptin Among Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan: A Retrospective Observational Study
【24h】

Real-world Effectiveness of Liraglutide vs. Sitagliptin Among Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan: A Retrospective Observational Study

机译:Liraglutide的真实效力与SitaGliptin患者2型糖尿病患者中的患者,注册医疗保险优势处方药计划:回顾性观察研究

获取原文
       

摘要

IntroductionLiraglutide and sitagliptin were compared on glycemic control and all-cause healthcare costs over a 1-year period among older adults with type 2 diabetes (65–89?years) enrolled in a national Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug health plan.MethodsThis was a retrospective study in which the index date was the first prescription fill for liraglutide or sitagliptin between 25 January 2010 and 31 December 2014. Post-index treatment persistence and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1 c ) at baseline and 1?year (±?90?days) post-index date were required. Patients were excluded if their record included use of insulin during the baseline period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using stabilized weights was employed with final covariate adjusted regression modeling to estimate the primary outcome (mean change in HbA1 c ) and secondary outcomes (achieving glycemic goal and costs), each at 1-year post-index date.ResultsOverall, 3056 patients met the selection criteria, of whom 218 filled prescriptions for liraglutide and 2838 for sitagliptin. Adjusted mean change in HbA1 c at 1?year post-index was???0.42 with liraglutide versus ??0.12 with sitagliptin ( P =?0.0012). Adjusted odds of achieving the treatment goals of HbA1 c ??7% and achieving an HbA1 c reduction of?≥?1% were higher for those on liraglutide than for those on sitagliptin (1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25–2.24 and 1.76, 95% CI 1.31–2.36), respectively. Total healthcare costs in those achieving an HbA1 c of ?7% were not significantly different between treatment groups but were higher within the liraglutide group for those achieving an HbA1 c ??8%.ConclusionsWhen compared to sitagliptin, liraglutide was associated with greater achievement of an HbA1 c ??7% over a 1-year period in an older population. This finding was not associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause total healthcare costs, although costs were slightly higher in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group.
机译:在血糖控制和血糖控制和全部导致医疗保健费用中的介绍性血征和SitaGliptin在患有2型糖尿病(65-89岁)的1年期间(65-89岁)处于国家医疗保险优势处方药物健康计划..Hetsthis是一个回顾性研究其中指数日期是2010年1月25日至2014年12月31日至2014年12月31日之间的第一份处方填充。在基线和1次(±90?天)后,指数治疗持续和糖基化血红蛋白(HBA1c)(±90?天)索引日期是必需的。如果他们的记录包括在基线期间使用胰岛素的情况,则被排除在外。使用稳定重量的治疗加权的逆概率与最终的调节重量进行反差异化建模,以估计每次索引后1年的初级结果(HBA1 C的平均变化)和二次结果(实现血糖目标和成本),每次索引日期为1年.Resultsoverall ,3056名患者遇到了选择标准,其中218个填充了Liraglutide的处方和SitaGliptin的2838年。调整后的HBA1 C在1?年后的平均变化是索引的??? 0.42与Liraglutide与S​​ITAGLIPTIN的0.12(P = 0.0012)。调整了实现HBA1 C的治疗目标的几率?<?7%并实现HBA1 C的降低Δ≥1%,对于Liraglutide(1.68,95%置信区间隔[CI] 1.25- 2.24和1.76,95%CI 1.31-2.36)分别。治疗组之间的HBA1 C的人的总医疗保健成本没有显着差异,但丽射蛋白质组内较高,用于达到HBA1 C的那些,与SitaGliptin相比,当时丽格勒蛋白有关成就HBA1 C?<?7%在老年人口中的1年内。这一发现与全源总医疗成本的统计学显着增加无关,尽管黎拉纽丁组的成本略高于SITAGLIPTIN组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号