...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine >Effect of Observer Experience in the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Liver Tumors After Ultrasound Contrast Agent Injection
【24h】

Effect of Observer Experience in the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Liver Tumors After Ultrasound Contrast Agent Injection

机译:超声造影剂注射后良性和恶性肝肿瘤差异化观察者体验的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the observer level of experience on the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging (CEUS) for differentiation between benign and malignant liver tumors. Methods. From a computerized search, we retrospectively identified 286 biopsy-proven liver tumors (105 hepatocellular carcinomas, 48 metastases, 7 intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 33 liver hemangiomas, and 93 nonhemangiomatous benign lesions) in 235 patients (140 male and 95 female; mean age ± SD, 56 ± 11 years) who underwent CEUS after sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection. The digital cine clips recorded during the arterial (10–35 seconds from injection), portal (50–120 seconds), and late (130–300 seconds) phases were analyzed by 6 independent observers without experience (group 1, observers 1–3) or with 2 to 10 years of experience in CEUS (group 2, observers 4–6). Specific training in the diagnostic and interpretative criteria was provided to the inexperienced observers. Each observer used a 5-point scale to grade diagnostic confidence: 1, definitely benign; 2, probably benign; 3, indeterminate; 4, probably malignant; or 5, definitely malignant on the basis of the enhancement pattern during the arterial phase and enhancement degree during the portal and late phases compared with the liver (hypoenhancement indicating malignant and isoenhancement to hyperenhancement indicating benign). Results. The analysis of observer diagnostic confidence revealed higher intragroup (κ = 0.63–0.83) than intergroup (κ = 0.47–0.63) observer agreement. The experienced observers showed higher diagnostic performance in malignancy diagnosis than did inexperienced observers (overall accuracy: group 1, 63.3%–72.8%; group 2, 75.9%–93.1%; P < .05, χ2 test). Conclusions. The diagnostic performance of CEUS in liver tumor characterization was dependant on the observer's level of experience.
机译:客观的。本研究的目的是评估观察者的影响程度对对比增强超声成像(CEUS)的诊断性能进行良性和恶性肝肿瘤之间的差异。方法。从计算机化搜索中,我们回顾性地确定了286名活组织检查成熟的肝脏肿瘤(105个肝细胞癌,48个转移酶,7个内肝胆胆管癌,33例患者,33例肝血管瘤和93个非致症状良性病变)(140名男性和95名女性;平均年龄在六氟化含量的微泡注射液后接受了CEU的±SD,56±11年。在动脉期间记录的数字电影剪辑(从注射10-35秒),门户(50-120秒)和晚期(130-300秒)阶段进行了6个独立观察员,没有经验(第1组,观察者1-3 )或在CEUS的2至10年经验(第2组,观察员4-6)。向未经经验的观察员提供诊断和解释标准的具体培训。每位观察者使用5分尺寸为等级诊断信心:1,绝对良性; 2,可能是良性的; 3,不确定; 4,可能是恶意的;或者5,在动脉阶段期间的增强模式和门静脉期间的增强程度和晚期阶段的增强程度与肝脏(低血压表达良性病症的恶性和异血性表明良性的病毒性和异血性表明良性疾病的后期阶段的增强程度的恶性的恶性。结果。观察者诊断置信度分析显示出比杂项(κ= 0.47-0.63)观察员协议的内容更高的内容(κ= 0.63-0.83)。经验丰富的观察者在恶性诊断中表现出更高的诊断性能,而不是缺乏经验的观察者(总体准确性:第1组,63.3%-72.8%;第2组,75.9%-93.1%; p <.05,χ2次测试)。结论。 Ceus在肝脏肿瘤表征中的诊断性能取决于观察者的经验水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号