...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences >Tilling tests of rotary tiller and power harrow after subsoiling
【24h】

Tilling tests of rotary tiller and power harrow after subsoiling

机译:旋转分蘖和功率耙后的矫直试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Soil preparation is one of the most energy-consuming activities in plant production. To reduce the operating cost and the soil compaction effect, researchers have tried to decrease the number of machinery passes required for soil preparation, including using a rotary tiller and a power harrow as potential devices to incorporate with a subsoiler. In this study, field tilling tests were conducted using a rotary tiller and a power harrow under with- and without-subsoiling beforehand. The results in the field without subsoiling beforehand showed that both the rotary tiller and power harrow had mean negative drafts of ?4.31 and ?1.98 kN, respectively. The rotary tiller showed mean negative slip of ?1.09% while the power harrow showed mean positive slip of 2.40%. The negative slip implied an amount of surplus thrust to push a tractor moving forward. The rotary tiller generated upward vertical force while the power harrow resulted in downward vertical force. In the field tilling tests after subsoiling, the rotary tiller in the loam soil field still produced a mean negative draft of ?1.36 kN and mean negative slip of ?0.70%. The power harrow resulted in a mean positive draft of 3.83 kN and mean positive slip of 0.68%. However, with a relatively hard surface of sandy loam soil field, the rotary tiller had a mean positive draft of 1.59 kN and could till down only about a half of its maximum working depth capacity while the power harrow still worked at about its maximum depth. It was observed the bouncing movement of the rotary tiller rather than successful penetration of the soil. The power harrow seemed to produce a smaller mean soil clod diameter than the rotary tiller. The proposed equation may be useful to quantify the amount of surplus thrust generated by the rotary tiller and power harrow; however, further research is needed to improve the fit of the equation to the data.
机译:土壤制剂是植物生产中最具能耗的活动之一。为了降低运营成本和土壤压实效果,研究人员试图减少土壤制备所需的机械通行证数量,包括使用旋转分蘖和动力耙作为潜在装置,以掺入底阱。在该研究中,使用旋转分蘖和预先在旋转的旋转分蘖和功率耙下进行现场耕作试验。事先出现的田间的结果显示,旋转分蘖和动力耙均分别具有Δ4.31和α1.1.98kn的平均阴性涂料。旋转分蘖显示出平均负单?1.09%,而电力耙显示为2.40%的平均阳性。负面滑动暗示了推动拖拉机向前移动的剩余推力。旋转分蘖产生向上垂直力,而电力耙导致向下垂直力。在底部耕作试验中,壤土土壤领域的旋转分蘖仍然产生了一个平均负面草案?1.36 kn和平均负单?0.70%。电力耙导致平均阳性草稿3.83 kn,平均阳性差为0.68%。然而,随着砂土土壤领域的一个相对较硬的表面,旋转分蘖有一个平均正面的1.59 kn,并且可以直到其最大工作深度容量的大约一半,而电力耙仍然在其最大深度上工作。它被观察到旋转分蘖的弹跳运动而不是成功渗透土壤。电力耙似乎产生比旋转分蘖的较小平均土泥。所提出的方程可能有助于量化旋转分蘖和动力耙产生的剩余推力的量;然而,需要进一步研究来改善等式的拟合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号