首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare >Assessment of Health Research Capacity in Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD): A Study on Medical, Nursing and Allied Health Professionals
【24h】

Assessment of Health Research Capacity in Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD): A Study on Medical, Nursing and Allied Health Professionals

机译:悉尼西部当地卫生区健康研究能力评估(WSLHD):医疗,护理和盟军卫生专业人士研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Research should inform clinical decision-making and evidence-based practice for all health professionals. To build research capacity among all health professionals, there is a need to measure the levels of research capacity and identify the gaps and needs of health-care professionals. The aim of the study was to better understand the research culture and capacity of health professionals (medical, nursing and allied health) in Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia. Methods: A research capacity and culture tool (RCCT) survey was electronically distributed to all health staff in WSLHD. Data were collected between November 2016 and January 2017. Participants were surveyed through a 10-point Likert scale that measured research capacity at the individual, team and organisational levels. Results: A total of 393 health staff responded to the study: allied health practitioners (46.3%), nursing staff (35.4%) and medical practitioners (18.3%). Females made 76% of the sample, and 54% were aged between 35 and 54 years. Individual responses were different across professions, with an average median score for medical 6.3 (95% CI 5.8– 6.9), allied health 5.3 (95% CI 4.9– 5.7) and nursing 4.5 (95% CI 4.1– 5.0) after adjustment for age and gender. Team responses for medical staff (average median score 5.9 95% CI 5.3– 6.4) were higher than allied health (4.1 95% CI 3.7– 4.6) and nursing (4.3 95% CI 3.8– 4.8), after adjusting for age and gender. However, there were no differences between the three professions for the organisational responses. Allied health and nursing staff were less confident in obtaining research funding, submitting ethics applications, writing for publication and mentoring colleagues about research. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the individual research capacity for medical, allied health and nursing professionals are different. Research capacity building needs to be individually tailored to the specific needs of each profession. This research will inform future capacity building activities and training for health professionals in a large public health organisation of Sydney, Australia.
机译:背景:研究应为所有卫生专业人员提供临床决策和基于证据的做法。为了建立所有卫生专业人员之间的研究能力,需要衡量研究能力水平,并确定医疗保健专业人员的差距和需求。该研究的目的是更好地了解澳大利亚悉尼悉尼西悉尼当地卫生区的卫生专业人士(医疗,护理和盟国健康)的研究文化和能力。方法:研究能力和文化工具(RCCT)调查被电子方式分配给WSLHD的所有保健人员。 2016年11月至2017年1月之间收集了数据。参与者通过10分的李克特量表进行调查,以衡量个人,团队和组织层面的研究能力。结果:共有393名卫生工作人员回应了这项研究:盟军卫生从业者(46.3%),护理人员(35.4%)和医学从业者(18.3%)。女性制成76%的样品,54%的人在35至54岁之间。各个响应在职业方面是不同的,医疗6.3(95%CI 5.8-6.9),盟友5.3(95%CI 4.9-5.7)和护理4.5(95%CI 4.1- 5.0)进行年龄后和性别。团队回应医务人员(平均中位数5.9 95%CI 5.3-6.4)高于盟国健康(4.1 95%CI 3.7-4.6)和护理(4.3 95%CI 3.8-4.8),调整年龄和性别后。但是,组织反应的三个专业之间没有差异。盟军健康和护理人员在获得研究资金,提交道德申请,写作出版物和关于研究的同事时不太自信。结论:本研究表明,医疗,盟军健康和护理专业人员的个人研究能力不同。研究能力建设需要单独量身定制,以满足每个职业的特定需求。本研究将在澳大利亚悉尼的大型公共卫生组织的卫生专业人员中通知未来的能力建设活动和培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号