...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences >A Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Direct Bonding System with and without a Liquid Primer: An In Vitro Study
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Direct Bonding System with and without a Liquid Primer: An In Vitro Study

机译:直接粘合系统与液体底漆直接粘接系统的比较研究:体外研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: A primer in dental bonding agents enhances the bond between the adhesive and the tooth by way of deriding the tooth surface of moisture and creating a hydrophobic surface for the adhesive to bond and by facilitating the flow of the adhesive into the etched tooth surface. In the orthodontic context, however, there have been debatable results in the published literature as to how significantly the use of primer affects the bond strength between the bracket and the tooth surface.Aims:This study aimed to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of two commercially available direct bonding systems with and without using liquid primer and to record their adhesive remnant index scores.Settings and Design:A total of 100 natural human teeth, extracted for orthodontic therapies, had been selected as specimens for the study. They were equally divided into four categories. Two commercially available products were used to bond metallic orthodontic brackets to the teeth, both with the use of and without the use of a primer to test the shear bond strengths of the four types of adhesive-tooth complexes created. Shear bond strength was measured using universal testing machine, and Student’s t-test was applied for the comparison of the results.Materials and Methods:A total of 100 extracted human premolar teeth were divided into two groups: Group I and Group II, each of which contained two subgroups (with one subgroup pretreated with a primer and the other, not pretreated with the primer). All the teeth were divided equally among the subgroups and were mounted on color-coded acrylic blocks to aid in identification. Group I was bonded with Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive (3M Unitek Orthodontic Products, Monrovia, California) and Group II was bonded using Phase II two-paste system (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, Illinois). The shear bond strength of Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive used with Transbond XT primer and Phase II orthodontic two-paste system used with liquid primer was compared with that of those used without a liquid primer, respectively. The shear bond strength was evaluated using universal testing machine and the adhesive remnant scores were evaluated subsequently. The Student’s t-test was applied for comparison of the two groups.Statistical Analysis:Descriptive statistics, such as mean, standard deviation, and a standard error, were calculated for Transbond XT used with and without primer and for Phase II two-paste system used with and without a liquid resin. The Student’s t-test was applied for comparison of the two groups.Results:In Group I, the mean bond strength of Transbond XT without primer (12.5272MPa, 95% CI: 11.76–13.68) was compared to that of Transbond XT with XT primer (13.2028MPa, 95% CI: 12.39–14.06). In Group II, the mean shear bond strength of Phase II two-paste system without primer (10.66MPa, 95% CI: 10.13–11.18) was compared to that of Phase II two-paste system with primer (10.66MPa, 95% CI: 10.13–11.18), and the values were statistically insignificant.Conclusion:The shear bond strength of the brackets bonded with Transbond XT and Phase II without using the liquid primer was sufficient enough to withstand the masticatory forces, which implies the elimination of liquid primer during bonding.
机译:背景技术:牙科键合剂中的底漆通过延期牙齿的水分和牙齿的牙齿和牙齿之间的粘合剂,并产生粘合剂的疏水表面,以促进粘合剂的流入蚀刻齿面。然而,在正畸语境中,发表的文献中有难题的结果是如何显着使用底漆影响支架和牙齿表面之间的粘合强度。此次研究旨在评估和比较剪切粘合强度两种商用直接粘合系统,且不使用液体底漆并记录其粘合剂残留的指数分数。填充和设计:为研究的标本选择了用于正畸疗法的100种天然人牙齿。它们同样分为四类。两种市售产品用于将金属正畸括号粘合到牙齿上,无论是使用底漆还不使用引物测试所产生的四种类型的粘合剂复合物的剪切粘合强度。使用通用试验机测量剪切粘合强度,并且施用学生的T检验以比较结果。材料和方法:将100种提取的人掠刷分为两组:I组和II组含有两个亚组(用一个亚组用底漆预处理,而不是用底漆预处理)。所有牙齿在亚组中等于划分,并安装在彩色编码的丙烯酸块上,以帮助鉴定。将群体与替代XT光固化粘合剂(3M Unitek Orthogontic产品,蒙草,加利福尼亚)和II组使用II期两粘贴系统(Reliance正畸产品,Itasca,Intinois)键合。将与液相用液引物一起使用的转桥XT底漆和与液相底漆一起使用的二晶XT引物和期正交的两浆化系统的剪切粘合强度分别与没有液相底漆的那些。使用通用试验机评估剪切粘合强度,随后评估粘合剂残余分数。学生的T-Test用于比较两组。统计分析:描述性统计数据,例如平均值,标准偏差和标准误差,用于与底晶XT和无引物和II期两粘贴系统的替代XT计算与液体树脂一起使用。学生的T检验用于比较两组。结果:在I组中,没有引物的伯晶XT的平均键合强度(12.5272MPa,95%CI:11.76-13.68)与XT的伯文XT相比底漆(13.2028MPa,95%CI:12.39-14.06)。在第II族中,与底漆(10.66MPa,10.66MPa,95%CI)的II期二浆体系统的II期二浆系统的平均剪切粘合强度(10.66MPa,95%CI:10.13-11.18)进行比较(10.66MPa,95%CI :10.13-11.18),并且该值统计学是微不足道的。结论:与转桥XT和期II的支架的剪切键强度足以承受咀嚼力,这意味着消除液体底漆在粘接期间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号