首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Photobiomodulation therapy does not decrease pain and disability in people with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review
【24h】

Photobiomodulation therapy does not decrease pain and disability in people with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review

机译:PhotobioModulation疗法不会降低具有非特异性低腰疼痛的人的疼痛和残疾:系统审查

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

QuestionIn people with non-specific low back pain (LBP), what are the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on pain, disability and other outcomes when compared with no intervention, sham PBMT and other treatments, and when used as an adjunct to other treatments?DesignSystematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis.ParticipantsPeople with acute/subacute or chronic non-specific LBP.InterventionsAny type of PBMT (laser class I, II and III and light-emitting diodes) compared with no treatment, sham PBMT and other types of treatment, or used as an adjunct to another treatment.Outcome measuresPain intensity, disability, overall improvement, quality of life, work absence and adverse effects.ResultsTwelve randomised controlled trials were included (pooled n?= 1,046). Most trials had low risk of bias. Compared with sham PBMT, the effect of PBMT on pain and disability was clinically unimportant in people with acute/subacute or chronic LBP. In people with chronic LBP, there was no clinically important difference between the effect of PBMT and the effect of exercise on pain or disability. Although benefits were observed on some other outcomes, these estimates were imprecise and/or based on low-quality evidence. PBMT was estimated to reduce pain (MD??11.20, 95% CI??20.92 to??1.48) and disability (MD??11.90, 95% CI??17.37 to??6.43) more than ultrasound, but these confidence intervals showed important uncertainty about whether the differences in effect were worthwhile or trivial. Conversely, PBMT was estimated to reduce pain (MD 19.00, 95% CI 9.49 to 28.51) and disability (MD 17.40, 95% CI 8.60 to 26.20) less than Tecar (Energy Transfer Capacitive and Resistive) therapy, with marginal uncertainty that these differences in effect were worthwhile.ConclusionCurrent evidence does not support the use of PBMT to decrease pain and disability in people with non-specific LBP.RegistrationCRD42018088242.
机译:与无干预,假PBMT和其他治疗相比,患有非特异性低背疼痛(LBP)的人,对疼痛,残疾和其他结果的影响有什么影响,并且当用作其他辅助时治疗方法?使用急性/亚急性或慢性非特异性LBP的PBMT(激光等级I,II和III和发光二极管)与急性/亚急性或慢性非特异性LBP的分析系统综述。与无治疗,假手术,假手推车和其他类型的治疗,或用作另一种治疗的辅助。措施强度,残疾,整体改善,生活质量,工作缺失和不良反应。包括随机对照试验(合并N?= 1,046)。大多数试验都有很低的偏见风险。与假PBMT相比,PBMT对疼痛和残疾的影响在急性/亚急性或慢性LBP的人中临床上不重要。在患有慢性LBP的人中,PBMT的效果与运动对疼痛或残疾的影响之间没有临床上重要差异。虽然在其他一些结果上观察到福利,但这些估计是不精确的和/或基于低质量证据。 PBMT估计减少疼痛(MD ?? 11.20,95%,20.92至?? 1.48)和残疾(MD ?? 11.90,95%CI ?? 17.37至3.43)超过超声,但这些置信区间表现出效果差异是否有价值或微不足道的重要不确定性。相反,估计PBMT减少疼痛(MD 19.00,95%CI 9.49至28.51)和残疾(MD 17.40,95%CI 8.60至26.20),小于TECAR(能量转移电容和电阻)疗法,这些差异的边际不确定性实际上是值得的。结论电流证据不支持使用PBMT来减少非特定LBP.RegistrationCRD42018088242的人们的疼痛和残疾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号