...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Optometry >Differential visual acuity – A new approach to measuring visual acuity
【24h】

Differential visual acuity – A new approach to measuring visual acuity

机译:差分视力 - 一种测量视力的新方法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background A novel type of acuity measurement, which we refer to as ‘differential acuity’, requires the observer to identify one unique target among three others which are identical. This is a proof of concept study aimed to determine if differential acuity is equivalent to standard measures of recognition acuity. Methods To create a range of visual acuity, vision was optically blurred in sixteen adults with normal visual acuity. Visual acuity was then measured with the differential acuity targets in both crowded and uncrowded format, and compared with standard ETDRS acuity or with singly presented letters and uncrowded letters were analysed separately. Results The visual acuity results for crowded and uncrowded letters were analysed separately. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that when a crowded Sloan C had to be differentiated from three crowded Os (CvsO), the results were not significantly different from ETDRS acuity or from naming one of four letters presented centrally (Name4) ( p ?0.05). Similar results were found for uncrowded letters – the C versus O and Name4 gave similar visual acuity. The 95% limits of agreement between the naming and C versus O differential acuity measures were between 0.17 and 0.27 logMAR. Conclusion From this proof of concept study we conclude that differential acuity gives similar results to the ETDRS chart in adults. We infer that the comparable but cognitively simpler differential visual acuity task could be applied in clinical settings for young children or patients with developmental delay who cannot respond by naming or matching.
机译:背景技术我们称为“差分敏锐”的新型敏锐度测量要求观察者在三个方面识别一个唯一的目标。这是一个旨在确定差分敏感度等于识别敏锐度的标准测量的概念研究证明。制造一系列视力的方法,视力在6个成年人中被光学模糊,具有正常的视力。然后通过拥挤和未使用的格式中的差分敏锐度靶测量视力,并与标准的ETDRS或单独呈现的字母和单独分析的字母进行比较。结果分别分析了拥挤和未收集的字母的视力结果。反复措施的方差分析表明,当一个拥挤的斯隆C必须与三个拥挤的OS(CVSO)区分开时,结果与ETDRS敏锐度没有显着不同,或者从中央呈现的四个字母中的一个(P <?0.05 )。发现类似的结果对于未收集的字母 - C与O和姓名4具有相似的视力。命名和C与辅助敏锐度措施之间的95%的协议限制为0.17和0.27 Logmar。结论来自概念研究证明,我们得出结论,微分敏锐度与成年人的ETDRS图表相似。我们推断可比但认知的更简单的差动视力任务可以应用于幼儿或患者无法通过命名或匹配作出响应的患者的临床环境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号