...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study
【24h】

Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study

机译:Denpezil Plus Memantine与Opepezil单独用​​于治疗伴随的阿尔茨海默病和慢性阻塞性肺病:回顾性观测研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To assess the clinical outcomes of donepezil plus memantine (DM) and donepezil (DO) alone in Asian patients with a concomitant diagnosis of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease and mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AD-COPD). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with AD-COPD who received either DM or DO for 6 months, or until the occurrence of unacceptable adverse events or disease progression, between June 2012 and May 2016. The primary endpoint was the score on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). Secondary endpoints were scores on the caregiver-rated Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)-Proxy, and General Health Questionnaire 12. Results In total, 154 eligible patients received DM, whereas 156 received DO. Compared with patients who received DO, patients who received DM had significantly higher mean scores on the SMMSE by 2.1 points (95% confidence interval, 1.3–2.5). Significant between-group heterogeneity was not detected in outcomes over time. The benefits of treatment with DM were greater than those of treatment with DO, in terms of the primary endpoint. Significant differences were also detected in terms of secondary endpoints. Conclusion DM is more effective than DO alone for Asian patients with AD-COPD.
机译:目的探讨单独诊断中度至严重的阿尔茨海默病和轻度至中度慢性阻塞性肺病(AD-COPD)的亚洲患者中单独诊断患者的临床结果和单独的培养哌齐(DM)和多奈哌齐(DO)。方法对患有DM或6个月的AD-COPD患者进行了回顾性分析,或直到2012年6月至2016年5月之间发生了不可接受的不良事件或疾病进展。主要终点是标准化的得分迷你精神状态考试(SMMSE)。次要终点是日常生活规模的照顾者额定的布里斯托尔活动中得分,神经精神清点,痴呆症生活质量(DEMQOL) - 普罗脂和一般健康调查问卷12。总共有154名符合条件的患者接受DM,而156则收到156名。与接受DO的患者相比,接受DM的患者在SMMSE上的平均分数明显高出2.1点(95%置信区间,1.3-2.5)。随着时间的推移,未在结果中检测到群体之间的重要性。在初级终点方面,DM治疗的益处大于用作治疗的益处。在次级终点方面也检测到显着差异。结论DM比独自为亚洲患者的抗议患者更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号