首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >ETView VivaSight single lumen vs. conventional intubation in simulated studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

ETView VivaSight single lumen vs. conventional intubation in simulated studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:Etview Vivasight单一腔与常规插管在模拟研究中:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective The ETView VivaSight single lumen airway tube (ETView) is a tracheal tube incorporating a video camera. We carried out a meta-analysis of previous simulation studies by inexperienced personnel to determine if the ETView could improve the success rate of first-attempt intubation. Methods We collected data from randomized controlled trials comparing the use of the ETView VivaSight single lumen versus a conventional endotracheal tube in a simulated manikin or cadaver study. Results Eleven studies (558 participants, 3,254 intubations, and 19 scenarios) were included. The ETView had a significantly higher success rate and shorter insertion time than conventional intubation in both normal airways (with or without chest compression) and in difficult airways. In addition, the ETView demonstrated better results in terms of a higher rate of Cormack?Lehane grade 1 and a lower incidence of dental trauma. Conclusions Inexperienced personnel can insert the ETView more rapidly and with a higher intubation success rate compared with a conventional tube.
机译:目的是etviewVivasight单一腔气道管(etview)是一种气管管,包括摄像机。我们对先前的仿真研究进行了荟萃分析,以确定etview是否可以提高第一次尝试插管的成功率。方法采集随机对照试验中的数据,比较ETVIEW Vivasight单个腔与常规气管插管中的使用在模拟的Manikin或Cadaver研究中的使用。结果包括11项研究(558名参与者,3,254个插管和19个方案)。 etview的成功率明显更高,插入时间短于正常气道(有或没有胸部压缩)和困难的气道中的传统插管。此外,etview在较高的鸬鹚速率方面表现出更好的结果,lehane级1和牙齿创伤的发病率较低。结论没有经验的人员可以更快地插入ETVIEW,并且与传统管相比,插管成功率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号