...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences >Follicular Flushing Versus Direct Aspiration at Oocyte Retrieval in Poor Responders Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Follicular Flushing Versus Direct Aspiration at Oocyte Retrieval in Poor Responders Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:在体外施肥的贫困响应者中卵泡冲洗与卵母细胞检索的直接吸附:随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: This study aims to study the effect of follicular flushing at oocyte retrieval on Assisted Reproductive Technique (ART) outcomes in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Settings and Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in the ART center of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A total of 71 patients who responded poorly during controlled ovarian stimulation were recruited. Patients were randomized to follicular flushing or to direct aspiration group. The primary outcomes of the study were the total number of oocytes retrieved and the number of metaphase (M II) oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes were anesthesia time, procedure time, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, total number of embryos, number of embryos transferred, number of Grade 1 embryos, failed oocyte recovery, failed fertilization, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test and Student's t -test. Results: The total number of oocytes retrieved, number of M II oocytes, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, total number of embryos, number of Grade 1 embryos, failed oocyte recovery, failed fertilization, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were comparable between the two groups. The anesthesia and procedure time was significantly higher in the flushing group. Conclusions: Follicular flushing does not result in a significant improvement in the ART outcomes despite increasing procedure and anesthesia times.
机译:目的:本研究旨在研究卵母线检索卵泡冲洗对体外施肥的贫困患者辅助生殖技术(ART)结果的影响。设置和设计:在我们医院的艺术中心进行了预期随机对照试验。材料和方法:招募了71名受控卵巢刺激期间患者的71名患者。患者被随机分配到卵泡冲洗或直接吸气组。该研究的主要结果是所检测的卵母细胞的总数和所检索的中期(MI II)卵母细胞的数量。二次结果是麻醉时间,程序时间,施肥率,切割率,胚胎总数,转移的胚胎数,1级胚胎,失败的卵母细胞恢复,施肥失败,植入率,临床妊娠率,流产率,并活出生率。使用统计分析:Chi-Square测试和学生的T -Test。结果:检索卵母细胞的总数,M II卵母细胞的数量,施肥率,裂解率,胚胎总数,1级胚胎,卵母细胞恢复失败,施肥失败,植入率,植入率,流产率和活产率失败两组之间的比较。冲洗组中麻醉和术时显着较高。结论:尽管增加了程序和麻醉时间,但卵泡冲洗不会导致艺术结果的显着改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号